Google Cloud AI vs. Litera Kira

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Cloud AI
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud AI provides modern machine learning services, with pre-trained models and a service to generate tailored models.N/A
Kira
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kira, now from Litera (acquired August, 2021) is software that searches and analyzes contract text. Kira offers pre-built, machine learning models covering due diligence, general commercial, corporate organization, real estate and compliance. Using Kira Quick Study, anyone can train additional models that can identify any desired clause. Kira can be deployed on virtual data rooms and other large repositories of contracts, creating summary analyses.N/A
Pricing
Google Cloud AILitera Kira
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Cloud AIKira
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Google Cloud AILitera Kira
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Cloud AILitera Kira
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(6 ratings)
7.6
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.6
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(3 ratings)
7.5
(21 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Cloud AILitera Kira
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Cloud AI is a wonderful product for companies that are looking to offset AI and ML processing power to cloud APIs, and specific Machine Learning use cases to APIs as well. For companies that are looking for very specific, customized ML capabilities that require lots of fine-tuning, it may be better to do this sort of processing through open-source libraries locally, to offset the costs that your company might incur through this API usage.
Read full review
Litera
Kira is a great due diligence tool and can be well utilised on both large and small transactions. It also has good application if you are looking to compare multiple documents against a model form document or market standard templates. Kira is less useful if you are looking to review emails (e.g. as part of a disclosure exercise); or if your review involves non-Latin based script languages.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • good conversion from the voice to the text
  • speed in the conversion from voice to text
  • time-saving in the conversion activity
  • analysis of the results of the conversion in real time
Read full review
Litera
  • UI/UX - tagging and naming feels much easier than you'd expect machine learning to feel
  • Accuracy - Kira's built-in models perform well out of the box
  • Assistance - Kira's support team gets back to me same day if I have a question
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Some of the build in/supported AI modules that can be deployed, for example Tensorflow, do not have up-to-date documentation so what is actually implemented in the latest rev is not what is mentioned in the documentation, resulting in a lot of debugging time.
  • Customization of existing modules and libraries is harder and it does need time and experience to learn.
  • Google Cloud AI can do a better job in providing better support for Python and other coding languages.
Read full review
Litera
  • Inability to relabel smart fields to suit the review process means it is hard to align it to particular projects (e.g. it would be useful to relabel the "Assignment" smart field as "Is the contract assignable?")
  • Not enough non-English smart fields.
  • Needs the ability to resell user-trained smart fields in a marketplace.
  • Output is not customizable enough.
  • Built-in analysis tools are useful but a little basic.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
We are extremely satisfied with the impact that this tool has made on our organization since we have practically moved from crawling to walking in the process of generating information for our main task to investigate in the field through interviews. With the audio to text translation tool there is a difference from heaven to earth in the time of feeding our internal data.
Read full review
Litera
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
So far we have not had any problems with the application, it is extremely easy to use and it is also easy to install. It does not require much training since the instruction is quite clear for its execution and application in the procedures of the company. The team in charge of this application is very pleased to work with this app.
Read full review
Litera
If our firm had more contracts in English, the usability of Kira would be rated higher. However, since we have to train clauses in Portuguese in order to use Kira, it makes its usability lower. We still are not able to fully use Kira for reading contracts in Portuguese. It takes a long time and many associate hours to make Kira usable in other languages.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
Every rep has been nice and helpful whenever I call for help. One of the systems froze and wouldn't start back up and with the help of our assigned rep we got everything back up in a timely manner. This helped us not lose customers and money.
Read full review
Litera
Customer Support is excellent. The online help portal is probably the best I have ever seen. Great videos with content easily found. The HelpLine is staffed by knowledgeable people. The videos have saved us providing a lot of in-house training, which we would struggle to resource. The account managers really know the product and their law firm clients and share best practices and trends.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
In fact, you only need the basic tech knowledge to do a Google search. You need to know if your organization requires it or not,. our organization required it. And that is why we acquired it and solved a need that we had been suffering from. This is part of the modernization of an organization and part of its growth as a company.
Read full review
Litera
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
These are basic tools although useful, you can't simply ignore them or say they are not good. These tools also have their own values. But, Yes, Google is an advanced one, A king in the field of offering a wide range of tools, quality, speed, easy to use, automation, prebuild, and cost-effective make them a leader and differentiate them from others.
Read full review
Litera
Kira offers a lot more out of the box than other providers and is also more flexible around integrations. This, plus the clear pricing structure, is why we went for it instead of (or as well as) others. Diligen, RAVN, Leverton, Della, Seal not in list.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Artificial intelligence and automation seems 'free' and draws the organization in, without seeming to spend a lot of funds. A positive impact, but who is actually tracking the cost?
  • We want our employees to use it, but many resist technology or are scared of it, so we need a way to make them feel more comfortable with the AI.
  • The ROI seems positive since we are full in with Google, and the tools come along with the functionality.
Read full review
Litera
  • Positive ROI: Increased comfort level of attorneys and use of tech
  • Neutral ROI: It has not significantly change how we handle projects, since there still is a need for manual review
  • Negative ROI: It has been cost prohibitive to scale it
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kira Screenshots

Screenshot of Login ScreenScreenshot of Kira DashboardScreenshot of Document & Contract ReviewScreenshot of Training Custom Smart Fields