Google Tag Manager vs. TransUnion TruAudience

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
From Google, the Google Tag Manager is a tag management application that facilitates creating, embedding, and updating tags across websites and mobile apps, thus gaining the benefits of data standardization and speed of deployment. Google touts an agency friendly system with multiple user access, and tools to improve tags performance like debugging, and rules, macros or automated tag firing. The Google Tag Manager also integrates with Google product DoubleClick. Moreover, Google Tag Manager is…N/A
TransUnion TruAudience
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
TruAudience (formerly Signal Tag Management) from TransUnion (acquired August 2020) is a solution that aims to help marketers, web analysts and agencies establish autonomy from IT development cycles, accelerate the launch of new data-driven initiatives and campaigns while significantly improving website performance.N/A
Pricing
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Considered Both Products
Google Tag Manager
Chose Google Tag Manager
BrightTag, Qubit, SuperTag and Tealium all have great products, without a question, and they're are great for organizations with very specific tagging needs. With that said, Google has a history of building phenomenal products - Google AdWords, Google Analytics, etc. and their …
TransUnion TruAudience
Chose TransUnion TruAudience
We're currently using Signal Tag Management because Google Tag Manager wasn't as robust as it is now. It gets the job done, but we do have our challenges with editing or creating existing tags whenever there is an issue with the site. It requires a lot of time to go through …
Chose TransUnion TruAudience
Bright tag is already in use within our company so there was some bias there.

TagMan was a bit expensive but from what I saw, potentially worth it, especially if reporting is important. I believe they had a great global presence.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Google Tag Manager
9.8
53 Ratings
13% above category average
TransUnion TruAudience
9.0
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions9.853 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Tag Manager
8.1
64 Ratings
1% above category average
TransUnion TruAudience
8.4
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Tag library7.859 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Tag variable mapping8.052 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags7.563 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution8.358 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring7.855 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Page load times8.346 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Mobile app tagging8.432 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions8.735 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Product A and Product B
Google Tag Manager
9.0
64 Ratings
8% above category average
TransUnion TruAudience
9.0
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Event tracking9.961 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Mobile event tracking9.844 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Data distribution management8.639 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Universal data layer8.755 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Automated error checking7.944 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Small Businesses
Adobe Experience Platform Launch
Adobe Experience Platform Launch
Score 8.9 out of 10
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.7 out of 10
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.7 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Likelihood to Recommend
9.7
(68 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(6 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.3
(13 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(11 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Tag ManagerTransUnion TruAudience
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Google Tag Manager is well suited when the marketer or marketing team does not work closely with the developers. In this scenario, it means that the marketer can deploy 3rd party tools such as live chat widgets, advertising pixels, and much more themselves in a timely manner. Google Tag Manager may be less relevant in an organization where the marketer is also the developer or has a strong development background, where they can implement the 3rd party tags directly on the site when they need. But even in this instance, there's still great benefit in using Google Tag Manager.
Read full review
TransUnion
Well suited to campaigns and smaller task teams of less than 100. For these sizes, the group conversations work well, and the ability to search conversations and multimedia is perfect for finding previous information. For larger groups, information could very easily get lost, and requires a break-up into groups that would defeat the purpose of such a group chat.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Selecting elements on a site [object, class, cookie, etc] (to later fire an event, send some data, etc) is very easy with triggers. Want to add an event when someone clicks on a button? Super easy. It was many many DOM selectors and you can even add custom functions if you need to do something more specific
  • In general, firing events in different circumstances is very easy mixing triggers and tags. You can track almost any element of the DOM and do whatever you want with it.
  • Testing is a great functionality. Only you can see what's on the site and you can debug it easily by seeing which events or tags were triggered and all the DOM elements involved (and why they matched the trigger).
  • Working in environments (staging, production) and versioning is easy to do, deploying changes in 2 clicks.
Read full review
TransUnion
  • Populating your library with new tags is simple whether you're duplicating an existing tag or creating an entirely new one.
  • Creating the firing conditions for a tag.
  • Adding users to different groups with limited or full admin permissions.
  • If you know JavaScript, you shouldn't have an issue with assigning values to the proper variables once your data layer is set up for each page and/or action.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • There are several good integrations, but there can always be more. Native tracking for call tracking solutions, analytics providers, non-Google advertisers would be top of my list.
  • Documentation is just dreadful. Luckily there are some awesome folks out there doing crowdsourced tutorials (shout out to Simo Ahava) but by and large the Google Tag Manager instructions are worth what you pay for them.
Read full review
TransUnion
  • Placing quotes around variable names in the Tag Attributes, but not in the Event Handlers has caused me to mess up more than once.
  • Being able to search the account for all instances of certain text would be very helpful (e.g., search for s.eVar30 to find all places where I set that SiteCatalyst variable).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
Google Tag Manager makes tracking traffic to our websites effortless, which enables our developers to focus on other tasks. Setting up a new instance takes only minutes and additional scripts can be added/modified without touching the source code of a site in production. This enables our marketing directors to coordinate tests and experiments with minimal effort.
Read full review
TransUnion
Because of all of the previous benefits that I mentioned, GM has mandated that any DSP that we use for their campaigns must be integrated with BrightTag. Therefore we will have to use BrightTag for all future GM business
Read full review
Usability
Google
Google Tag Manager is the definition of a learning curve. At the beginning, you can barely do the minimum and it can seem questionable as to why you would use it. However, as users begin to learn its offerings and see how it can do much more, they will have a moment where GTM becomes a tool that empowers their ability to track and efficiently collect data for important business questions.
Read full review
TransUnion
Based on the features and current usage. It shows some buggy pages plus the service and support is really very slow. The updates are not regular and company needs to work on that. The usability is good and reporting of tags is accurate which is the best part. The pricing of the product is good and can be used by organizations of all sizes.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
It depends wether you are seeking official support from Google itself, in which case it would be rated very low because it's not their business model, they would rather have you work with one of their Google Analytics Certified Partner (GACP). In terms of self-served support, Google offer extensive documentation at https://developers.google.com/tag-manager/, recently revamped training (https://analyticsacademy.withgoogle.com/course05/preview), has active forums and user community (https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/104865292981489764063) which can typically answer even the most advanced questions.
Read full review
TransUnion
Support is really slow and it takes days to resolve an issue. Plus we have to inquire regularly for the status of resolution. Company should definitely work towards that
Read full review
Online Training
Google
I thought there was a little bit too much emphasis on AdWords stuff, not enough on the generic application of GTM.
Read full review
TransUnion
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Google
Planning and communication will help greatly with an in-house implementation. If there are large teams, try to limit the number of people involved to 1-2 developers (back-end dev may be necessary depending on your platform), one analytics marketer and one project manager.
Read full review
TransUnion
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
We moved to GTM from a standard Google Analytics implementation. GTM is much more flexible and easier to make changes, especially as the changes relate to multiple sites and environments. While there is a learning curve when figuring out how to use GTM, I believe the change has been worth it because it helps us understand at a more fundamental level how our tracking works and gives us a lot more control over what we track and how.
Read full review
TransUnion
Most of the tag solutions I've worked with were not nearly as robust. Most systems will let you load another tag not directly placed on the site, but none provide all the different firing levers that BT does
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • GTM is very useful to determine if a particular element on the site is useful (i.e. is it being watched, is it being clicked, does it help customers navigate through more pages). As an SEO person, I can use this information to decide what to optimize for but also to track progress and see improvements in engagement.
  • With the use of Google Tag Manager, I was able to easily inject an A/B testing tool which lead to several improvements in lead generation.
Read full review
TransUnion
  • Wonderful for ensuring we meet our logistical and record-keeping requirements
  • Negative at being the best at quality-of-life options, like specific muting
  • Great at allowing a casual work environment in having chats for memes, pets, etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots