H2O.ai vs. Jupyter Notebook

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
H2O.ai
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
An open-source end-to-end GenAI platform for air-gapped, on-premises or cloud VPC deployments. Users can Query and summarize documents or just chat with local private GPT LLMs using h2oGPT, an Apache V2 open-source project. And the commercially available Enterprise h2oGPTe provides information retrieval on internal data, privately hosts LLMs, and secures data.N/A
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
Pricing
H2O.aiJupyter Notebook
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
H2O.aiJupyter Notebook
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
H2O.aiJupyter Notebook
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
8.5
21 Ratings
1% above category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings9.021 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings9.220 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings8.514 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings7.415 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.6
21 Ratings
13% above category average
Visualization00 Ratings9.621 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings9.621 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
21 Ratings
9% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings9.320 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings8.921 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings8.514 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings9.314 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
8.9
21 Ratings
5% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings9.218 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings9.221 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
H2O.ai
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
8.8
19 Ratings
3% above category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings8.819 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings8.718 Ratings
Best Alternatives
H2O.aiJupyter Notebook
Small Businesses
Astra DB
Astra DB
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Astra DB
Astra DB
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Dataiku
Dataiku
Score 7.9 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
H2O.aiJupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(3 ratings)
8.4
(22 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
H2O.aiJupyter Notebook
Likelihood to Recommend
H2O.ai
Most suited if in little time you wanted to build and train a model. Then, H2O makes life very simple. It has support with R, Python and Java, so no programming dependency is required to use it. It's very simple to use. If you want to modify or tweak your ML algorithm then H2O is not suitable. You can't develop a model from scratch.
Read full review
Open Source
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
Read full review
Pros
H2O.ai
  • Excellent analytical and prediction tool
  • In the beginning, usage of H20 Flow in Web UI enables quick development and sharing of the analytical model
  • Readily available algorithms, easy to use in your analytical projects
  • Faster than Python scikit learn (in machine learning supervised learning area)
  • It can be accessed (run) from Python, not only JAVA etc.
  • Well documented and suitable for fast training or self studying
  • In the beginning, one can use the clickable Flow interface (WEB UI) and later move to a Python console. There is then no need to click in H20 Flow
  • It can be used as open source
Read full review
Open Source
  • Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
  • The ability to see the output after each step.
  • The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
  • Easy-user friendly interface.
Read full review
Cons
H2O.ai
  • Better documentation
  • Improve the Visual presentations including charting etc
Read full review
Open Source
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
Usability
H2O.ai
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Support Rating
H2O.ai
The overall experience I have with H2O is really awesome, even with its cost effectiveness.
Read full review
Open Source
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
H2O.ai
Both are open source (though H2O only up to some level). Both comprise of deep learning, but H2O is not focused directly on deep learning, while Tensor Flow has a "laser" focus on deep learning. H2O is also more focused on scalability. H2O should be looked at not as a competitor but rather a complementary tool. The use case is usually not only about the algorithms, but also about the data model and data logistics and accessibility. H2O is more accessible due to its UI. Also, both can be accessed from Python. The community around TensorFlow seems larger than that of H2O.
Read full review
Open Source
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Read full review
Return on Investment
H2O.ai
  • Positive impact: saving in infrastructure expenses - compared to other bulky tools this costs a fraction
  • Positive impact: ability to get quick fixes from H2O when problems arise - compared to waiting for several months/years for new releases from other vendors
  • Positive impact: Access to H2O core team and able to get features that are needed for our business quickly added to the core H2O product
Read full review
Open Source
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
ScreenShots