Helix ALM vs. OpenText LoadRunner Professional

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Helix ALM
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Helix ALM (formerly TestTrack) is an application performance testing and application requirements management suite.N/A
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
Pricing
Helix ALMOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Helix ALMLoadRunner Professional
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Helix ALMOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Helix ALMOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Helix ALM
-
Ratings
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
6 Ratings
0% below category average
End to end performance management00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Integrated performance data00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Real time monitoring00 Ratings6.15 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Helix ALMOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Helix ALMOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Helix ALMOpenText LoadRunner Professional
Likelihood to Recommend
Perforce Software
Helix ALM is very well suited for maintaining traceability between user needs, requirements and tests for medical device design controls. It allows users to customize the reports to create a traceability matrix or any other reports that are needed. It is also a good program for tracking issues and bugs and for storing/linking verification and validation test protocols and reports.
Read full review
OpenText
Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
Read full review
Pros
Perforce Software
  • Traceability for design controls.
  • Managing workflow of bugs/issues.
  • Maintaining risk management information.
Read full review
OpenText
  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Read full review
Cons
Perforce Software
  • Better integration with electronic document control systems like Arena PLM.
  • Easier setup in the back end (customization is available but the interface is not intuitive).
Read full review
OpenText
  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Read full review
Support Rating
Perforce Software
The support from Perforce has been extensive and allowed us to customize the setup of Helix ALM specific to our needs. They also hosted training sessions for our users and administrators and provided us with troubleshooting help during initial setup.
Read full review
OpenText
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Perforce Software
The other tools that we evaluated did not have all of the capabilities and customization that Helix ALM had to offer and therefore we decided to select Helix ALM.
Read full review
OpenText
HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Perforce Software
  • Improved management of requirements, risks and bugs to make sure they don't get lost in emails or long documents.
Read full review
OpenText
  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Read full review
ScreenShots