QuickEntry by HGS vs. SAP Responsible Design and Production

Scenarios where a company needs to have a lot of visibility and control over the materials it uses for manufacturing, companies that are generators of polluting materials and companies that need to manage different EPRs in different countries. It is perhaps less useful for smaller companies whose sector is not related or involved in waste management and who do not have much volume or presence abroad. These may be able to cope with a customised development that contains their costs.

• Helps us redesign packaging for cost and waste savings.
• Reduces industrial waste, ensures timely delivery and decreases global carbon footprint.
• Helps us better optimize our packaging which leads to product longevity.
• Overall it gives us an edge in EPR compliances due to its versatile approaches.

• On the subject of our Business, we need to have Ecovidrio (Ecoembes) declaration included in RDP, as soon as possible. It is urgent for us.
• The features feed for uploading information to the RDP should be more streamlined and user friendly
• I would also improve the data quality part, it doesn't really make it clear where the problem might lie.

As declarations will be incorporated, we will be able to have the data of all of them in one place, which allows us to be agile and save time and costs.

SAP Responsible Design and Production needs regulatory alignment.

Incentivized

These are some of the other Risk Management softwares known of. Although these solutions may not match SAP's offerings as an entire package (as just focusing on the Risk management side for this question) and not fully knowledgeable to their capabilities but SAP Responsible Design and Production provides a reliable system that performs well and provides the data analytics we require.

• It helped us to monitor impact of global regulations on our new product
• It helped us to manage the product packaging data
• It had a positive impact only, no negative points till now

Incentivized