IBM File Transfer Service vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM File Transfer Service
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM® File Transfer Service is a cloud-based managed file transfer solution for business-to-business (B2B) interactions. It is used to manage a single, security-rich, highly reliable connection between a business and its partners. File Transfer Service offers an alternative to more expensive on-premises software while helping to reduce the operational impact on technology staff.N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation
Score 6.5 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation is a hybrid cloud platform for managing VMs and orchestrating containers, built on full-stack hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) technology. With a single architecture that is desribed by the vendor as easy to deploy, VMware Cloud Foundation aims to enable consistent, secure infrastructure and operations across private and public cloud.N/A
Pricing
IBM File Transfer ServiceVMware Cloud Foundation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM File Transfer ServiceVMware Cloud Foundation
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM File Transfer ServiceVMware Cloud Foundation
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM File Transfer ServiceVMware Cloud Foundation
Small Businesses
DataMotion
DataMotion
Score 8.9 out of 10
StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
DataMotion
DataMotion
Score 8.9 out of 10
StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
Score 6.0 out of 10
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM File Transfer ServiceVMware Cloud Foundation
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM File Transfer ServiceVMware Cloud Foundation
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
It is best suited for an on-premise cloud solution where customer can shift their entire production environment. Also, the customer has a preference for a Homogenous Infrastructure Environment where budget is not a challenge. It is not at all suited for a Heterogenous Environment, e.g., a Public cloud where integration becomes a huge issue, also in SMB sections where budget is challenging.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
  • Cloud enabled Solution.
  • Support Container based Apps.
  • Cost efficient.
  • Supports both Public and Private Environments.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
  • The Deployment is complex.
  • Recommended Number of Physical Nodes is three or more; with less than 3 Nodes, it becomes difficult to install V-SAN.
  • Need for better integration. If we go on the public cloud, it is a huge challenge while integrate with an open source platform.
  • Cost can be marginally reduced. SMB segments still prefer a separate license instead of VCF, or they postpone their purchase plans.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
Although the public Cloud Model follows Opex Costing Model, it actually leads to very high costs also, the infra model in my organization is not suited for a Public Cloud Model. Hence We decided on an On-Premise Model, and the best suited was VMware Cloud Foundation, which is a complete Software-Defined Scale-Out Architecture. I also prefer a Homogenous environment; i.e, support and services from a Single OEM, so that I Can get faster resolutions to my tickets raised.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
  • My organization has a size of 1300+ employees, using multiple applications and an exchange mail server that is hosted on On-Premise Cloud, hence scalability has not been a challenge.
  • Having hosted my Production environment and Mail exchange Server on VCF, there has been optimum resource utilization with very little scope downtime. Hence have been able to save a lot of funds on Hardware resources.
  • Due to the size of my organization and due the data load, I have been able to save on Resource Utilization and Organization Funds
Read full review
ScreenShots