TrustRadius

IBM IMS vs. O'Reilly Katacoda

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM IMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM IMS, for Information Management System, is a database and transaction server.N/A
Katacoda
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Katacoda, now from O'Reilly Media headquartered in Sebastopol, is presented as an Interactive Learning and Training Platform for Software Engineers Helping Developers Learn and Companies Increase Adoption. Katacoda was acquired by O'Reilly Media in 2019.N/A
Pricing
IBM IMSO'Reilly Katacoda
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM IMSKatacoda
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM IMSO'Reilly Katacoda
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
IBM IMSO'Reilly Katacoda
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.4 out of 10
A Cloud Guru (Linux Academy)
A Cloud Guru (Linux Academy)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.4 out of 10
A Cloud Guru (Linux Academy)
A Cloud Guru (Linux Academy)
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM IMSO'Reilly Katacoda
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM IMSO'Reilly Katacoda
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
We have built a database of a network of bank branches with all the needs of security and recovery/restart. It requires knowledge of obsolete maintenance languages and perhaps it is too rigid in the schemes.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
O'Reilly Media
No answers on this topic
Pros
IBM
  • Security
  • Reliability
  • Big volume of data and good performance
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
O'Reilly Media
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • Certainly, not being a DB relational penalizes its use
  • It should be more flexible
  • Open up to more recent languages
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
O'Reilly Media
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Essentially, for a question of reliability and scalability, the performance has always been of an enterprise level. The utilities are efficient and effective.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
O'Reilly Media
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • The investment made about 20 years ago that has been fully repaid
  • Reliability and security of investments
  • Unfortunately, it is quite outdated and therefore maintenance costs are higher because the skills are not always available.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
O'Reilly Media
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots