BMC AMI Ops vs. IBM OMEGAMON

Modernization of APM, Security, and monitoring capabilities for customers running mission-critical workloads on the Mainframe.

Incentivized

Certainly, the tool is useful for debugging applications and for real-time monitoring. It's a bit less useful, not to say useless when applications are client servers. We have used it heavily above all to optimize the DB/2 applications. We managed to reduce the need for additional MIPS year by year.

Incentivized

• High MIPS utilization.
• Database lock and contention.
• Improving overall security posture on top of ACF2, Top-secret and RACF.

Incentivized

• reliability
• strength
• effectiveness

Incentivized

• AI capabilities.
• UX design made more intuitive.
• Observability for Mainframe and distributed platforms in a single pane.

Incentivized

• it itself consumes cpu
• the interface is not user-friendly
• every release migration is a surprise

Incentivized

BMC AMI Cloud and Data provides a data resiliency solution for the cloud. It is for customers looking to 1. backup their decades-worth of data stored in physical or virtual tapes to Cloud storage (AWS S3), 2. perform analytics and business intelligence to run targeted customers or campaigns on mainframe data now available in the cloud, and 3. use the data as backup/ restore copies in the event of a disaster.

Incentivized

Naturally, during the software selection, other tools from other similar vendors were compared as functionalities. more benchmarks have been made to control the Omegamon overhead on applications. certainly, it has influenced the fact that the mainframe base software is IBM and Omegamon is IBM so the compatibility problems are automatically solved.

Incentivized

• at the time we decided it was the only product which fit for our requirements

Incentivized

• the baseline of mips under control
• mic invoice flat
• immediately resolve problems

Incentivized