IBM Planning Analytics vs. Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) is a solution that helps users model and plan across finance, HR, supply chain, and sales, streamline the financial close process. Oracle Cloud Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) Platform is a framework of the technical and functional components shared among Cloud EPM processes.
$250
per user/per month
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
EPM Standard
$250
per user/per month
EPM Enterprise
$500
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing per user varies by component within the Oracle EPM Cloud solution. Please see pricing information for the EPM Cloud components on cloud.oracle.com or contact Oracle Sales at +1.800.633.0738.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Compare to its competition it has good visual and graphical interface that helps to customized according to user needs. It helps to apply the best possible algorithm according to different model scenario that provides the best possible results. Predictive forecasting and AI …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM allows to build flexible models from the scratch. IBM Planning Analytics with Watson does not include non-planning features in one package, so you don't pay for something you may not need.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson does quite well in comparison to industry giants although it does have room for improvement. Many of our clients are also well accustomed to Oracle for instance. So it's user-friendliness that helps some tools get ahead of others. The more you …
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
81 Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.6
3 Ratings
35% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.372 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.381 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.976 Ratings4.43 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
23 Ratings
11% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.384 Ratings9.722 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.385 Ratings9.521 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.565 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.982 Ratings8.419 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
84 Ratings
2% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.0
19 Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web7.879 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.378 Ratings8.919 Ratings
Report Versioning8.378 Ratings9.017 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.669 Ratings9.015 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.9
84 Ratings
4% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
5.9
3 Ratings
25% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.384 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.179 Ratings6.83 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.675 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
87 Ratings
5% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.2
24 Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.685 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.686 Ratings9.323 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.687 Ratings8.920 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.712 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.281 Ratings9.321 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.4
77 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.2
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.476 Ratings6.22 Ratings
Mobile Application6.941 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.950 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
91 Ratings
11% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.8
38 Ratings
6% above category average
Long-term financial planning9.589 Ratings9.230 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.591 Ratings9.738 Ratings
Forecasting9.591 Ratings8.937 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.590 Ratings8.635 Ratings
Management reporting8.790 Ratings7.833 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.5
85 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
20 Ratings
13% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.381 Ratings9.817 Ratings
Journal entries and reports8.376 Ratings9.714 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.875 Ratings8.913 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.575 Ratings8.914 Ratings
Minority Ownership6.768 Ratings8.612 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.578 Ratings9.716 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.280 Ratings8.216 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
86 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
8.4
34 Ratings
2% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.482 Ratings9.629 Ratings
Management Reporting8.883 Ratings7.932 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.585 Ratings8.430 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting8.875 Ratings7.828 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.854 Ratings8.519 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.1
87 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
7.7
25 Ratings
4% below category average
Personalized dashboards9.386 Ratings8.225 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards9.382 Ratings7.73 Ratings
KPIs9.385 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.485 Ratings6.74 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting9.484 Ratings8.124 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.958 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.8
87 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
9.1
36 Ratings
9% above category average
Flat file integration8.984 Ratings9.634 Ratings
Excel data integration9.585 Ratings9.632 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.177 Ratings8.228 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Anaplan
Anaplan
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(97 ratings)
8.9
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(5 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(62 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.3
(87 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(16 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsOracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
I would be likely to recommend IBM Planning Analytics, particularly in scenarios where comprehensive financial and operational planning is essential. For instance, in our construction company, it is awesome for optimizing resource allocation across multiple projects, creating detailed project budgets, and conducting risk analysis to mitigate project uncertainties.
Read full review
Oracle
It is well suited in a geographically distributed environment where you have various key participants in multiple time zones providing input and necessary explanations on performance and measured success It is less appropriate where you have a single office environment with a single finance department working together. It is also less suited when the GL is NOT an Oracle product and the interface between the GL and the reporting software needs to be implemented with utmost care and handling.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Forecasting after taking into account seasonal trends and exceptional transactions
  • Unlike spreadsheets, there is no fear of an user making changes to the mastercopy accidentally. Each user gets his or her own workspace to analyze.
  • For entities operating in multiple countries, connects seamlessly with IBM Cognos Controller for taking into account variation in currencies
Read full review
Oracle
  • Account Reconciliation CLoud Services provides tight integration with Oracle R12 and 11i . Provides drillback capability. It is flexible and provides rich functionality to users.
  • We have implemented ARCS on cloud and migrated planning and budgeting from On premise to PBCS and EPBCS. Functionality is onpar with onpremise. Provides regular updates monthly
  • We don't need to upgrades every year and saved a lot on Hardware.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • IBM Planning Analytics was an upgrade from an older version of TM1 that is experiencing some growing pains, some functionality is harder to reach than it has been in the past
  • It is easy to learn as a surface user with created reports, but it does require some technical skills to make advanced calculations and reports if there is no reliable consultant available, much like Excel
Read full review
Oracle
  • The limitation of constrained out of the box dimensions that requires ripping the initial implementation to add the new dimensions is a major drawback.
  • Smartview interface is cumbersome for many.
  • The only financial adapter is available for integration for other modules we have to go with file-based uploads which is cumbersome and not real-time.
  • It is very costly in terms of licensing unlike other Oracle products.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Oracle
We have a pretty good userbase who are at the high level who gained value from this tool. Discontinuing this tool is prone to impact their day to day operations. Also the data in this tool cannot alter the source, which maintains the integrity of this tool. Smartview is a cool addition that gained lot of traction as well.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
For developers, admins and end users looking for flexibility, IBM Planning Analytics would rate very highly on usability. For example, a developer has access to a highly performant built-in ETL (Extract Translate Load) tool and scripting language called Turbo Integrator that can (among other things) bring in data via flat file or direct connection from many data sources, move data around Planning Analytics, perform batch calculations, export to files or other data stores. In the rare situation where limitations are encountered there is a well documented REST API. Admins and end users benefit from the intuitive PAW (Workspace) interface as well as the rich Excel integration through Planning Analytics for Excel (PAfE). Since flexibility inherently comes with a little more complexity, so an organization with simple and "cookie-cutter" requirements may rate Planning Analytics a little lower.
Read full review
Oracle
EPM usability is good in some modules but needs some improvement in others
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
EPM has been so far available all the time
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product performance is so far very good
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Oracle
Support from our implementation partner is a 10/10, but support from Oracle is awful. Case in point: recently over a 2-day period, there were a series of intermittent outages. Oracle actually asked US for the outage time-stamps. I would have thought that, since we were paying them, they should probably be able to tell us!
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I suggest doubling the time to implement from the initial quote you get from the Sales team. That's always been the case for me for multiple EPMs now. The out-of-the-box functionality of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is pretty robust so I appreciate that and it really helped us get the ball rolling quickly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Anaplan does not handle sparsity; this is very problematic for large volume data sets (many 0's). There also are limitations to the number of dimensions that can be used in a module. If more dimensions are required, then separate modules need to be built and intertwined. IBM PA does not have these limitations.
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud fared very well against Adaptive, Anaplan, and Host Analytics. We ultimately decided on Oracle due to its reputation and strength of existing customers. We are happy with our decision.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The product is scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • One of the advantage is on its ability to ease budget and planning
  • Secondly,the fact that it allows for forecasting means based on such insights means that organisations are able to prepare for future eventualities
  • Thirdly, since it can accommodate data from multiple sources means that one is able to carry out best business practices like planning.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Significantly reduced the amount of money we spent for the maintenance of in-house hardware.
  • We now need less employees to manage the configurations of Oracle EPM Cloud.
  • There have been many time savings as a whole to apply to more productive causes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise DeploymentScreenshot of Planning and Forecasting - Decision-Oriented Plans with Instant Feedback Loop - What-If Modeling and SandboxScreenshot of Process and Workflow - Flexible Workflow and Process Management - Annotations - Concurrency in UsageScreenshot of User Interface - Role-Based, Intuitive User Interface - Role-Based Navigation Flows - Microsoft Office InterfaceScreenshot of Integration - External Integration - Oracle ERP Systems and Hybrid On-Premise Deployment