Likelihood to Recommend QRadar is very well suited on environments where there are not multiple tenants or domains, we do have success on this kind of scenario. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is less appropriate for environments with multiple tenants, specially when each tenant represent a different End Costumer (such as for MSSP companies), those environments require a high amount of rules and building blocks replications, since each tenant will have its own "BB definitions", servers, rules exception, etc. Also, some information, such as EPS count or EPS dropped are generated by QRadar's own log sources, which takes place on default domain, therefore users associated with different domain can not have access to those logs, even when the information is related to other domain's environment. For example, even if Event Collector 1 is associated to Domain A, the log informing its dropped EPS is generated by System notification, log source that must be associated to Default domain.
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
I believe that McAfee Enterprise Security Manager is best-suited for anyone in an office setting with a computer containing sensitive information. McAfee Enterprise Security Manager is constantly working to make sure that your device is free from an threats. Our field workers, however, probably wouldn't have a need for McAfee Enterprise Security Manager. They do not use computers for work and have no sensitive information stored in a work-related cloud.
Read full review Pros Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action. Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis. Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response. Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection. Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports. Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager has a large library of pre-made correlations that reduces the amount of work needed to make it functional. This is a core McAfee product that is still getting support. It has a substantial amount of compatibility and integration with other products. Read full review Cons Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources. While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting. Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
The user interface is not the best, it is still based on Flash player (but they have plans to migrate to HTML5). While the "user" interface is pretty straight forward, the management interface is fairly complicated. Read full review Likelihood to Renew With the arrival of IBM Security QRadar SIEM at our company, we have a better vision of all the security needs that may arise, it is a very safe software to use that prevents threats from damaging our IT environment, it is impossible to change it for another software.
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Usability A very special system to use without problems, the process is very genuine and does not require complicated procedures.
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Support Rating Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager overall is a great tool. It is effective in today's setting, wherein lots of potential threats are lurking. Its operations within the network are seamless. Users won't even notice that a SIEM is working in the background. But in today's trend, most of the businesses is heading towards the migration to cloud, which
McAfee should improve its integration with.
Read full review Alternatives Considered IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its competitors because it already sets an example in the SIEM world.
Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
We selected McAfee Enterprise Security Manager because the pricing is competitive in the industry. It is very reliable. The vendor offers good support in real time. Offers the results that we have been looking for. The ability to get the logs may be of last 2 years in a matter of seconds. The ability to retain logs for a very long time.
Read full review Return on Investment Offense investigation was really helped in tackling the incidents. It was accurate and brief The automation with IBM resilient (SOAR) was a milestone in elimination of user mistakes The X-Force threat intelligence supported us in getting the work done without any 3rd party enterprise OSINT database Read full review Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Centralisation of events form NIDS/IPS/IDS, Firewall(s), Web Proxy and Endpoint Ability to have third party management Actively upgraded product with good vendor support Read full review ScreenShots