IBM Storage Protect Plus vs. Microsoft System Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Storage Protect Plus
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Storage Protect Plus (formerly IBM Spectrum Protect Plus) provides data recovery for virtual environments and databases.N/A
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center Suite is a family of IT management software for network monitoring, updating and patching, endpoint protection with anti-malware, data protection and backup, ITIL- structured IT service management, remote administration and more. It is available in two editions: standard and datacenter. Datacenter provides unlimited virtualization for high density private clouds, while standard is for lightly or non-virtualized private cloud workloads.
$1,323
per month
Pricing
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard Edition
$1323
Datacenter Edition
$3607
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsIBM Spectrum Protect Plus is available in a monthly license or perpetual license.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
IBM Storage Protect Plus
9.0
4 Ratings
10% above category average
Microsoft System Center
-
Ratings
Universal recovery10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Small Businesses
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(4 ratings)
8.5
(20 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Storage Protect PlusMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Good for daily operational backups and their replications and areas like VM backup, when it comes to resting the backups in a cloud environment especially features like BYOL is an edge to IBM over its near competitors. On the other hand, a lot of scopes to improve to have native/application-aware backups for modern applications like AI and microservices.
Read full review
Microsoft
We used a product before that was designed to prevent users making changes and saving files to the desktop computer. This required a renewal of the license. By using SCCM in our environment we were able to discontinue using that product because SCCM allows us to completely restore a machine back to the original configuration. We have taught our users to save their individual work on either a network drive or a cloud drive. By doing this, if we do a re-image of their machine they have lost no data, and it makes for a faster resolution. In some instances having a computer in our SCCM environment it can become cumbersome when creating new users for very specific purposes. It can be done by creating new organizational units and applying new policies but when in a pinch it can be frustrating. For the most part we have tried to make "new" purpose images and groups to at least accommodate a quick install.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • recovery
  • replication
  • retention
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Provides our users the ability to deploy and manage our own datacenter based on defined software with understandable solutions for storage, compute, networking and security.
  • We are able to update at once all the computers from all departments without having to install the OS on every computer.
  • It allows us to have everything in one place for database management and datacenter inspection as well.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Incorporation of more touchless agents for physical servers.
  • Direct offload to tape - instead of requiring Spectrum Protect.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Needs web based storefront for requesting new software
  • Needs ability to manage the packaging work flow better
  • Sometimes is slow to download and there is no indication the entire catalog is being loaded, resulting in confused users not being able to find common software in the available list.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
If I had to dislike something about the system it would be how much it changes once you upgrade. This could be more of a problem of mine since I get used to one way and don't like it when it changes so much. I am enjoying the newest update, but it is a mess when you are actually going through the upgrades.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus doesn't allow taking backup of the Meditech HIMS application, due to the unique nature of the database and its functionality. As it's a special case, the vendor supports only a few fully integrated backup solutions which resulted in using Bridgehead as a trustable backup option specific to the application.
Read full review
Microsoft
We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows Updates, causing IT to have to constantly touch machines after they were imaged and update or manage them with a much more hands on approach.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Cloud backup can be expensive and slow
Read full review
Microsoft
  • We have been able to automate our patch management, firmware and other security concerns.
  • We have a standardized "image" ensuring our setup is consistent across the enterprise. This alone has saved us in time to support and time to understand how to use our desktops.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Storage Protect Plus Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of