IFS Applications vs. Infor LN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Infor LN
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
The Infor LN ERP software is focused on product manufacturing with both on-premise and cloud deployment and a robust analytics and dashboard interface.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Considered Both Products
IFS Applications
Chose IFS Applications
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation …
Infor LN

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
2 Ratings
94% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Pay calculation3.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration3.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files3.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Infor LN
8.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
API for custom integration8.44 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Plug-ins8.44 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Infor LN
7.5
1 Ratings
8% below category average
Single sign-on capability9.94 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.54 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Infor LN
7.0
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Dashboards6.94 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Standard reports7.44 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Custom reports8.94 Ratings7.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Infor LN
8.5
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Accounts payable9.04 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.04 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Infor LN
9.0
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking8.44 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.04 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Location management8.94 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.3
4 Ratings
39% below category average
Infor LN
9.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Pricing7.94 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Order entry8.44 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Credit card processing5.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.44 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Order Orchestration6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
3 Ratings
75% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Billing Management6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
3 Ratings
63% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
1 Ratings
30% above category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
3 Ratings
71% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared7.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management9.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
3 Ratings
36% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Risk Repository7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection5.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Production Process Design8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Forecasting7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.3
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Infor LN
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.5 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 8.5 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsInfor LN
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Infor
Infor ERP LN supports all discrete manufacturing processes including engineer-to-order, configure-to-order, project-based, make-to-order, and make-to-stock. If your company is a process manufacturing company, it may not be the best ERP for you.
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • Easy to configure and customize.
  • Facilitates financial reporting.
  • Easy to interface with external applications.
Read full review
Infor
  • As a global organization, we deal with many languages and some software localizations. Infor ERP LN has 21 language packs and a software localization for the countries where Bray operates that need one (Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Peru, Poland, Russia, and India).
  • We need flexibility, versatility, and visibility in our operations and financials. Infor ERP LN delivers most of what Bray needs in a standard ERP system, allowing us to operate without the need for complex software functionality customizations and/or personalizations.
  • Infor ERP LN has an easy-to-learn, easy-to-use, user-friendly GUI.
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • Customer Service
  • User Experience
  • Implementation
  • Follow-through
  • Automation
  • Integrations
Read full review
Infor
  • Infor ERP LN could have a better way of handling single sign-on (SSO) capabilities.
  • Infor ERP LN could improve its GUI by not using Java as its platform, using HTML5 instead. I know Infor is already working on it.
  • Infor ERP LN could improve the way you can "kill" a user license (needed when trying to disconnect a user without leaving in the background "defunct" processes).
Read full review
Usability
IFS
In our organization, the IFS Applications is being used in most processes starting from Business Opportunity processes to Sales Order delivery processes where the IFS Applications helps us to raise procurement requests for SCM, Production schedules for the Shop Floor, Supplier invoicing, Customer Invoicing. Additionally, the Payroll process is completely automated where travel requests to employee attendance is being directly captured in ifs cloud.
Read full review
Infor
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
Infor
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IFS
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Infor
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
Infor
  • Quick migration from different ERP systems and legacy systems to Infor ERP LN.
  • Increased employee efficiency.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of