IFS Applications vs. TrueContext

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
TrueContext
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
TrueContext (formerly ProntoForms) provides an enterprise-level low-code field-focused application. The solution is used to create apps and forms to collect and analyze field data with smartphones and tablets – either as a standalone solution or as a mobile front-end to enterprise systems of record.
$25
per month per license (billed annually)
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsTrueContext
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$25
per month per license (billed annually)
Advanced
$45
per month per license (billed annually)
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Volume discounts available
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsTrueContext
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS ApplicationsTrueContext
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
151% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Pay calculation1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
152% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
API for custom integration1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.5
2 Ratings
39% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.3
2 Ratings
137% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Dashboards2.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.4
2 Ratings
17% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Accounts payable8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.3
2 Ratings
59% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
2 Ratings
154% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Pricing1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
152% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Billing Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Period Close1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
149% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.2
1 Ratings
141% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Authoring1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Repository1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
147% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Risk Repository1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
31% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Production Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.0
1 Ratings
37% below category average
TrueContext
-
Ratings
Forecasting5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Custom logo/branding00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Changes to live survey00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Question design help00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Multiple question types00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Survey logic flexibility00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Response tracking00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Data export00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Analytics00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Access controls00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Compliance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
TrueContext
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Respondent restrictions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsTrueContext
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Qualaroo
Qualaroo
Score 6.7 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsTrueContext
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(2 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Usability
1.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsTrueContext
Likelihood to Recommend
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
Prontoforms is suited for complicated business needs that are able to integrate seamlessly into one of the out-of-the-box solutions available. For simple recording to a spreadsheet, pdf, word document, database, etc. without any additional integrations, better (and in some cases free) solutions may work. For custom integrations, cost and effort may get expensive.
Read full review
Pros
IFS
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
  • Conditional logic
  • Linking to data sources
  • Integration to Salesforce and ServiceMax
Read full review
Cons
IFS
  • The speed of bug fixes should be improved by the IFS after sales teams. We saw the difference of responsiveness prior to Go Live and after Go Live, with a change of teams. IFS France is working on that point, and strategically wants to innovate by acting now with two other third-party companies in early 2017, to improve the after sales experience for customers.
  • There is no license model between the full licenses, which gives access to all IFS features, and the light licenses, to get access to a specific module like expense sheet. As a consequence, you must acquire a full access license for one team working only with a dedicated module (e.g. general ledger). Maybe an intermediate type license would be welcome to balance the budget. IFS tries to make prices competitive but you have to consider full upgrades of the product too, where requiring full licenses can be hard on the budget.
  • When you have an Active Directory ecosystem with a trust relationship, users from domain B can't natively access IFS, even if AD sync is in place with domain A. It's important to improve that functionality because many companies have a merge and acquisition context, with SOX constraints sometimes, and avoiding maintaining contacts or local accounts simplifies SOX compliance, or to management of accounts within the company.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
  • Limitations to form formatting
  • Need more data source integrations
  • All of the different components need to synchronize automatically and more often.
Read full review
Usability
IFS
The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
As Prontoforms markets itself as a low code, user-friendly drag and drop solution, it definitely excels in the area of user experience. While those who are more on the technical side will appreciate the standard options available as part of its custom integration tools. The learning curve has never been an issue.
Read full review
Support Rating
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
The customer support for pronto forms was great for me in the only instance that I have had to use it. I called the phone number for ProntoForms customer support, they were quick with the correct answer for me and very reassuring.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IFS
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
We looked for versatility of product and cost effectiveness when trying to choose vendors. Even though the product can be set up by the user or administrator, the more complex parts of the form required help to be done right. Vendors needed to be able to offer their services to get this done in a timely fashion. ProntoForms hit all the marks. We looked at other vendors and they just couldn't replicate or form closely enough.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IFS
  • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
  • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
  • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
Read full review
TrueContext Corporation
  • Return on Investment is immediate and possible from the first submission.
  • Saved us hours when it came to implementing forms on websites
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

TrueContext Screenshots

Screenshot of task automationScreenshot of field operations tracking and measurementScreenshot of available integrations