iOFFICE by Eptura vs. Tririga

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
iOFFICE
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
iOffice Integrated Workplace Management System (iOffice IWMS) is an IT asset management and facilities management solution, from Houston-based company iOffice.N/A
Tririga
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Tririga is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
Pricing
iOFFICE by EpturaTririga
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
iOFFICETririga
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
iOFFICE by EpturaTririga
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
iOFFICE by EpturaTririga
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
iOFFICE by EpturaTririga
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
iOFFICE by EpturaTririga
Likelihood to Recommend
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
You can book multiple spaces for the day with one log in. IOffice is easy to use / I was trained by reading a few PowerPoint slides and could use it immediately. With Covid protocols in place it was important in be able to book space when needed since many of our offices were closed due to mitigation efforts
Read full review
IBM
It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
Read full review
Pros
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • It is very good at plotting out office seating.
  • We also use it for mail and package logging and notification and tracking.
  • It is very useful in creating seating charts and floor plans.
Read full review
IBM
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
Cons
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • The thing I would like to see is the ability to add the office or room dimensions and plot out seating such as in conference rooms.
  • The version I have requires me to have to contact the company rep to make changes to the configuration in the software.
Read full review
IBM
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
Usability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
User-friendly and quick to catch on to.
Read full review
IBM
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
Performance
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
Support Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I was an end user and was not involved in the selection of the systems
Read full review
IBM
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
Scalability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • 100% of staff you needed to be in office were required to use iOffice
  • Follow up surveys on iOffice use had a 95% positive response by users
  • Once pilot was completed, over 350 staff completed training and used iOffice since 2021
Read full review
IBM
  • It's a positive and works well with the business.
  • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
  • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
Read full review
ScreenShots

iOFFICE Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of