Ivanti Security Controls vs. SecurityScorecard

Agentless patching is the best of all the products I've used. The real-time updates that don't require re-scanning after each step is great.

Incentivized

Good:

* Initial recognition of perimeter

* Discovery of shadow IT assets

* Get nice reports to set baselines and objectives for your customers

Bad

* Does not provide threat intel as another tool

* Not enough documentation for the API or to automate scenarios

Incentivized

• Trusted ownership checking is a good way to implement effective basic protection.
• Patching is important today to react quickly to security problems. With Security Controls, it's easier than ever before.
• One console for whole security.

• Security Ratings
• Security Assessments
• Reporting Center

Incentivized

• Performance of the console when using agentless machines.
• The console layout is a bit cumbersome - would be better if all functions were accessible from one screen.
• Common deployment examples to assist with deployment types.

Incentivized

• Pricing could be reviewed for specific industries which were more impacted by the pandemic situation.

Incentivized

Support wasn't used as the cost didn't justify the expense. We have yet to use the support.

Incentivized

Since we have been using Application Control for about 15 years, it is, of course, the best solution for us. We also looked at other products (RES One Workspace), but they didn't convince us. Some features of RES were good and are now part of the User Workspace Manager. The Microsoft solution seems too complicated to us and does not have the advantages of Trusted Ownership Checking.

n/a

Incentivized

• Reduced amount of operating hours for administration of patching.

Incentivized

• Get insights about our external security posture
• Actionable tasks to solve

Incentivized