Izenda is a business intelligence software offering from Izenda.
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.
N/A
Pricing
Izenda
MS SharePoint / SQL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Izenda
MS SharePoint / SQL
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
No per user or core fees, unlimited use licensing for production and non-production instances.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Izenda
MS SharePoint / SQL
Features
Izenda
MS SharePoint / SQL
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
9.3
2 Ratings
13% above category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.2
62 Ratings
13% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports
9.02 Ratings
7.843 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
10.02 Ratings
6.659 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
9.02 Ratings
7.152 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
9.3
2 Ratings
15% above category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.1
57 Ratings
12% below category average
Drill-down analysis
9.02 Ratings
6.446 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
10.02 Ratings
8.057 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
9.02 Ratings
8.854 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
5.334 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Izenda
8.8
2 Ratings
6% above category average
MS SharePoint / SQL
7.7
62 Ratings
7% below category average
Publish to Web
9.02 Ratings
7.555 Ratings
Publish to PDF
9.02 Ratings
8.452 Ratings
Report Versioning
9.02 Ratings
7.352 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
8.02 Ratings
7.542 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
7.535 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
With Izenda, we can offer our trusted users dashboards, generated custom reports, and ad-hoc reporting, right within our own operation. Integrating the Izenda tool directly into our usage meant that we were suitable to use a small corridor of Izenda as core functionality while reserving the more advanced sections of Izenda for guests willing to pay redundancy for the licensing.
As I mentioned in my previous answers, MS SharePoint is very useful as a shared drive for the organization and is very easy to manage. It also helps us import data from SharePoint directly into PowerBI for creating reports. According to my understanding, only share link features should be improved.
User and tenant management is excellent. It is very simple to implement and easy to manage.
The configurability and customizability are excellent. We have access to all aspects of the system and have rebranded and configured single sign on. The users really like it.
Reports and visualizations work. There's lots of flexibility and users enjoy creating reports themselves.
This was a long-term buy-in from a corporate perspective, to remain in the SharePoint space. Migration is certainly possible, which is good for planning and having options further out. At this point, the only planned migration is to eventually move the architecture up to SharePoint/SQL 2013. At that point, we will be able to leverage some greater efficiencies, some enhanced content design and management features, and some more current social features. It is well worth a full consideration in any shop looking at a new implementation of or migration to SharePoint (although you will probably be considering 2013 versions or beyond in those discussions), but the platform should be a strong competitor to any alternatives. Realizing the capability of a fully-branded and customized website was not part of the original choice for the architecture at Lincoln, but seeing it implemented and functioning now with this capacity far beyond original expectations has certainly cemented plans to continue using it.
With the help of Izenda, we are able to build a mature foundation that users can quickly customize to their needs. Once permissions are layered in, we can simply use the same report and only show fields a specific user has access to.
I gave this rating due to MS SharePoint being a big help with our userbase. We have a lot of users that are just old enough to not have much technical skills or they have been in this industry long enough to where they haven't really needed to utilize much technology. MS SharePoint helped us move beyond that barrier without too many bumps and bruises.
I've only had to call in to support on one occasion but they were able to work though our issue and find a solution that did fully resolve the issue in a timely manner. I can't always say the same about support from other companies so it was a refreshing change to have support that did help.
We compared to other end user tools like Qlik, Tableau and Power BI. These tools are very refined but not positioned for OEM/Embedded use cases. The closest we came was logi and Birst and the price and business model of Izenda was much more appealing
At the time of the two large projects, SharePoint was the enterprise solution so we were required to use that. We have since lobbied the enterprise teams to review and consider Atlassian Confluence and were successful. Confluence is cheaper than Sharepoint which is why we wanted to bring that in. The enterprise has now made Confluence an enterprise solution as an alternative to SharePoint. After using both I think SharePoint has many more add-ins than Confluence. It has much more customization ability than Confluence. SharePoint is not good for mobile readiness. Confluence is so there is a difference that might lead you to Confluence over SharePoint. I would also say that SharePoint is very document-centric and that Confluence has better KM than SharePoint does. even with the use of SQL Server. We were told that we could not use Google Drive even though it had features we liked.