JFrog Security (Xray) vs. Sonatype Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JFrog Security (Xray)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
JFrog Security Essentials / Xray SCA can be used to discover and eliminate unwanted or unexpected packages, using JFrog’s database of identified malicious packages. It is presented as a DevOps-centric SCA solution for identifying and resolving security vulnerabilities and license compliance issues in open source dependencies.
$98
per month
Sonatype Platform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Sonatype secures the software supply chain and protects organizations' vital software development lifecycle(SDLC). The platform unites security teams and developers to accelerate digital innovation without sacrificing security or quality across the SDLC. With users among more than 2,000 organizations and 15 million software developers, Sonatype tools and guidance help users to deliver and maintain exceptional and secure software.
$165
Per user per month, billed annually per user
Pricing
JFrog Security (Xray)Sonatype Platform
Editions & Modules
Pro Team
$98
per month
Enterprise
$699
per month
Free
Free
Enterprise +
Contact sales team
Sonatype Nexus Repository
$145
per year per user
Sonatype Air-Gapped Environment Nexus Repository
$175
per year per user
Sonatype Repository Firewall
$224
per year per user
Sonatype Repository Firewall for Artifactory
$224
per year per user
Sonatype Air-Gapped Environment Repository Firewall
$230
per year per user
Sonatype Repository Firewall Cloud
$265
per year per user
Sonatype Lifecycle
$690
per year per user
Sonatype Lifecycle Cloud
$810
per year per user
Sonatype Air-Gapped Environment Lifecycle
$825
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JFrog Security (Xray)Sonatype Platform
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JFrog Security (Xray)Sonatype Platform
Considered Both Products
JFrog Security (Xray)

No answer on this topic

Sonatype Platform
Chose Sonatype Platform
Out of other products we evaluated before choosing Sonatype, the later looked far more user friendly, easy to understand and work with. This was key for us, as the tool needs to be used by many engineers that don't have security as their main focus. Having a tool that is easy …
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
JFrog Security (Xray)Sonatype Platform
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JFrog Security (Xray)Sonatype Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(12 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
JFrog Security (Xray)Sonatype Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
For a medium to large size organization with the possibility to setup a central support team to support the governance, maintenance and implementation of the Sonatype Platform, the product suite from Sonatype is very well suited. Setting up detailed configurations requires quite some effort and deep understanding of the Sonatype Platform. Whenever needed the support teams from Sonatype are available for technical and functional support. As well the Innovate platform of Sonatype offers customers to interact on specific topics and set up customer reference calls.
Read full review
Pros
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
  • Nexus firewall is a great feature enabled for all our proxy repositories which are used to download the third-party opensource packages.
  • Nexus IQ is integrated with build stage to analyze the component against evaluation policy. This helps to figure out the application security standards.
  • Nexus IQ is also having a feature to scan container images before it uploads to our private repository. This is great feature for container platforms.
Read full review
Cons
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
  • Recommendations for best Energy Consumption options based on existing BOM - e.g. replace component X with component Y to reduce CPU cycles.
  • More specific recommendations regarding Open Source Licensing - not just saying "Copyleft" but the next level of analysis (it's difficult - but would save a lot of time)
  • Provide specific component replacement options where no "next version" resolves a high severity vulnerability.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
Sonatype supports more than 200 dev(s). It proves with the repository to store the artifacts. Allows for governance of open source software used by the different teams. It is used by security teams to scan for vulnerabilities in software(s) and in the deployed containers. It helps ensure code quality.
Read full review
Support Rating
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
Monthly touchpoints with Sinisa has been very valuable.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
Out of other products we evaluated before choosing Sonatype, the later looked far more user friendly, easy to understand and work with. This was key for us, as the tool needs to be used by many engineers that don't have security as their main focus. Having a tool that is easy to understand and work with, makes the process of evaluating open source dependencies much easier and appealing for developers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
JFrog
No answers on this topic
Sonatype
  • Sonatype's centralized management of artifacts have made it very easy for developers to share code in an efficient manner.
  • Sonatype's low false positive rate has made it easier to convince developers to remediate vulnerabilities
  • Sonatype's archaic architecture has made it more expensive to manage than it could be.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Sonatype Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Sonatype LifecycleScreenshot of Sonatype Lifecycle - Chrome extensionScreenshot of Sonatype Advanced Legal PackScreenshot of Sonatype Nexus RepositoryScreenshot of Sonatype Nexus Repository ManagerScreenshot of Remediation of vulnerabilities