JIRA Software is an application lifecycle management solution for software development teams. It allows users to create, prioritize and track the progress of tasks across multiple team members, and offers a wide range of integrations. It is offered via the cloud and local servers.
$10
per month
Miro
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Miro is an online collaborative whiteboard for cross-functional teams, boasting over 20 million product managers, project managers, Agile coaches, developers, and other team members around the world as users of Miro to collaborate, brainstorm, and visualize ideas.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
Jira Software
Miro
Editions & Modules
Standard
$7
Per User Per Month
Premium
$14
Per User Per Month
Free
Free
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jira Software
Miro
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
CONSULTANT: For consultants and agencies working with client teams.
$12 per user per month (billed annually)
BUSINESS: For teams requiring SSO and options for external collaborators.
$16 per user per month (billed annually)
ENTERPRISE: Custom pricing. Proposal upon request.
For companies that need advanced features and security.
Education (Classroom): Miro helps you to engage with your students wherever they are, guide discussions, design a research project, illustrate key concepts, leave feedback, and facilitate group work easily.
Free forever up to 100 users
Education (Student): Miro makes distance learning and working with classmates or colleagues easy and fun. If you're a student, an educator or a school, you can apply for a Miro account.
Free for 2 years & up to 10 users
Non-Profit: Nonprofit organizations get a 30% discount on paid Miro plans (per user per month) to support the important work they're doing.
30% Discount
Start-Ups: Miro is aiming at enabling startups to work effectively together, from brainstorming with digital sticky notes to planning and visualizing ideas to bring your business to life
$8 per user per month & a $1,000 credit
The applications seem similar but I had to use MURAL for a client engagement because it was the client's preference. However, MURAL did not have as many features as Miro.
We also did use MURAL. But in comparison we like the interface of Miro more. It is more intuitive and offer much more features which are very valuable. Most of our customers are also more familiar with Miro, why we would choose Miro as our go to.
I've used MURAL internally and essentially, it does everything that Miro does. I'm not sure what the differentiators are between the two products but to me, they are on in the same and I do not have a preference.
We tend to use both, but for different purposes. I have tried to use Figma as a collaborative tool for this sort of thing in the past, but it lacks key collaboration tools that miro provides. It's much better at designing screens and whatnot that will actually be implemented, …
We selected the FREE version of Miro. We did not buy it. As I said in earlier questions: for many tasks other applications like PowerPoint and Drawio are much more suited (and also free). For the barinstorm sessions, the free version of Miro is more then enough for us. There is …
Cost was very reasonable, the web-based platform makes it easier to get up and running without requiring software installs and approvals, multi-facted tool that does more than one job, range of templates for different applications, great onboarding and help material provided so …
I use both Figma and Miro and use them similarly. For people who are not UX designers Miro is more intuative with alot of features and integrations that are valuable to other teams.
we use Miro, Figma, Lucidchart interchangeably. we mainly use Miro for whiteboarding, idea gathering. once we define the process, then we translate that into Lucidchart for information sharing.
I have only used MURAL 2-3x and found it a bit clunky but overall similar. It has been 2-3 years since that experience. I was not interested in looking into MURAL more.
I have used FigJam until recently when company policy removed access. FigJam is great for design …
I often use FigJam since I'm in Figma already. That's an unfair advantage that Figma has. I haven't used MURAL much. Miro seems more friendly for beginners and for using in remote whiteboarding user research sessions.
We are using 2 products today and need to wind this down to one in 2023. But Miro wins at templates, multi-user collaboration, and I love some of it's differentiating features (Eg presentation mode)
It has more features to use like stickers, images, tool integrations. The recommended templates are also easing the workload while creating a new board.
The Jira software works well for managing scrum boards and allocating resources to a task. When your Epics and Issues are set up properly, it can give you a good idea of where your team stands and the trajectory of your project. It is not the ideal solution if you need to provide documentation and support to people outside of your product teams or organization. It would benefit from having a public documentation or repository feature.
I would recommend Miro for any situation where teams are mostly/completely remote and need to collaborate deeply within/across each other AND have a dedicated facilitator who can put time into setting up/maintaining the board. I think teams that are more strapped for time and resources will end up being too scrappy and not putting in the time to use Miro to it's full potential. Additionally, teams that are largely in person or mostly in person might get more value out of just using whiteboards and stickies.
Privacy mode to allow participate to create cards that are hidden by facilitator.
Polls or voting that is simplified.
Allow the facilitator to separate background/structure items (that cannot be moved) from other items that everyone can interact with (that can move), thus preventing error movements in boards.
While there are no fundamental problems with JIRA, I'm unsure that I will be working myself very closely with users of Atlassian Confluence. The client base I am concerned with tend to be more integrated with Amazon, IBM BlueMix / Watson, open source LAMP/PHP (WordPress, MediaWiki) & those that rely on more proprietary CMS would tend to use Sharepoint not Confluence. JIRA seems to me to stand or fall with the rest of the Atlassian silo or suite, as it is not closely integrated with Sharepoint or mediawiki based reporting or knowledge management. Data interchange standards in this area are weak so Microsoft, open source LAMP projects using Phabricator, and Atlassian JIRA seem to be three distinct silos, with Amazon, Google & IBM offering their own tools for similar needs.
Miro is very good but still too basic. It would be great to have more precision and some advanced tools. More control over the text size and objects alignment is a need for our design team. Also, the experience on the tablets is not so good. Many dead clicks and problems while trying to select objects and tools.
JIRA Software is a pretty complex tool. We have a project manager for JIRA who onboarded us, created our board, and taught us the basics. I think it would have been pretty overwhelming to learn without her. JIRA offers so much functionality that I'm not aware of -- I constantly need to Google or ask others about existing features. Also, although they are all under the Atlassian umbrella, I find it difficult to switch between JIRA Software and Confluence.
It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
Our JIRA support is handled internally by members of our Product Support team. It is not supported by a 3rd party. Our internal support will always sent out notifications for downtime which is usually done on the weekend unless it is required to fix a bug/issue that is affecting the entire company. Downtime is typically 3-4 hours and then once the maintenance is complete, another broadcast email is sent out informing the user community that the system is now available for use.
One of their strong points i stheir documentation. Almost all of the basic set up needed within JIRA is available online through atlassian and its easy to find and very precise. The more critical issues need to be addressed as well and hence the rating of 8 instead of a 9.
Superb. very well explained videos. Really helps get the knowledge up on the product. The slides are divided into the topics of usage. I have enjoyed following and implementing all of these slides. The videos are well explained and it is easy to follow. There are tutorials that you can take yourself later. It would be nice however if more training modules were added.
Take your time implementing Jira. Make sure you understand how you want to handle your projects and workflows. Investing more time in the implementation can pay off in a long run. It basically took us 5 days to define and implement correctly, but that meant smooth sailing later on.
We learned as we went when we first started with Miro. Most of the controls and functions were easy to understand right away. Some of the functions were less intuitive but we figured them out. I appreciate that Miro offers virtual walkthroughs of its functionality to help get new users up to speed
Jira Software has more integrations and has more features than many of its competitors. While some of its competitors do have better UI/UX than Jira Software, they have improved this greatly over time. Atlassian also acquired Trello years ago, so that adds better user interfaces to the system. They do also offer a pretty in-depth library of how to customize the platform that others don't.
Against draw.io Miro is next generation tool, but we are still using draw.io because of its simplicity for drawing AWS diagrams and exporting them, and it is free.
There is also a competitor not mentioned on the list, excalidraw. It outperforms miro when it comes to drawing mind maps and simple stuff.
I think, when miro shines is the whiteboard collaboration.
Miro makes it super easy to collaborate in a hybrid working environment.
Allows teams to work together on different projects, interactive workshops easily.
Saves time and cost. By allowing us to ideate engage and hold meetings in virtual room which enhances productivity and efficiency of all our employees.