JIRA Software is an application lifecycle management solution for software development teams. It allows users to create, prioritize and track the progress of tasks across multiple team members, and offers a wide range of integrations. It is offered via the cloud and local servers.
$10
per month
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
Jira Software
Miro
Editions & Modules
Standard
$7
Per User Per Month
Premium
$14
Per User Per Month
Free
Free
Enterprise
Contact Sales
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
It's fantastic and wouldn't substitute it for anything else.
Miro
Verified User
Consultant
Chose Miro
Regarding TeamRetro, Miro gives much wider possibility to create and edit retrospective boards. Jira is an excellent tool as well, if you have enough money to acquire all the necessary addons. I think Miro is overall a good and competitive tool for Jira as well, though more …
Its integration capabilities are top-notch and work well with our existing tools such as Confluence and Jira. Miro's flexibility also sets it apart. I can use different templates for various use cases.
The level of integration btw Miro and the other products we use has been a huge factor. The ease of use and the depth of capability in the product. We already has a large number of users in Miro already (and a number using other products) so this was predominately a …
I've used Microsoft Whiteboard >> Miro is far superior. I've also used Frameable Whiteboard, and although it has less integration, the interface is more intuitive and natural.
I also tried Microsoft Whiteboard. Miro's quality far surpasses ANY other product in its category in terms of robust features, ease of including board collaborators, and the vast collection of available templates.
My team is able to collaborate and communicate in real-time thanks to Miro collaborative features. It helps give a bird eye view of our projects we're working on and this also allows our clients to easily understand what we're doing and put in their contribution as well. It has …
As compared to other tools Miro is easier to use, has an easy learning curve, can be used by folks in a variety of roles from engineering to designers, has an intuitive UI, easy single sign-on integration, has an easy to use desktop app version that helps to speed up the work.
We selected Miro because it is really simple to use and it is accessible through a link with a login. I love the whiteboard feel that resembles how we used to work when work meant being in person. A lot of the other tools have more of a specific role in a project where Miro can …
Compared to Mural, Miro is more general and can be used by a wider range of professionals. Not only is there a reduced learning curve, but the interface also displays the most popular tools for drawing and editing dynamic types, among other things.
I believe that Miro is much superior to Jamboard, it has much more functionality and is a more complete tool. Confluence is very good for documenting, but it doesn't work well for designing product flows as it is limited to text. I would say that Miro and Confluence are …
For our use cases, either Miro or Lucid would do the job. However, I find Miro easier to use: with Lucid you have to know some key combinations (e.g.: zooming in or out, dragging objects, or just scrolling your screen) ALso, in a bird's eye view, I found the objects in Miro to …
At the beginning of the pandemic, we had to quickly find a remote alternative to face-to-face workshops, especially for our agile teams. Due to the feature set, Miro and Mural quickly became the clear favorites. In retrospect, I can no longer say what ultimately tipped the …
Overall, we found that Miro was easier to use and provided more proactive guidance and templates. Also, more people were familiar with the Miro brand and had used it in previous roles.
Miro is superior to all of them. There is honestly no comparison. I feel like all of the others make adjustments to try to enhance their platform to be similar to Miro, but the ease of use is just not there.
There are some areas where I really prefer lucidchart - particularly around complex ERDs, process engineering, and impact assessments. lucidchart's integration options and exporting options are all more thorough than Miro. However, Miro is a far superior tool when comparing it …