Jira Software vs. Projecturf

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jira Software
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
JIRA Software is an application lifecycle management solution for software development teams. It allows users to create, prioritize and track the progress of tasks across multiple team members, and offers a wide range of integrations. It is offered via the cloud and local servers.
$10
per month
Projecturf
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Projecturf is a web-based all-inclusive project management tool from Projecturf in Redondo Beach, CA. Projecturf has the core features associated to project management software, such as real-time notifications and activity feeds, integration with various apps and programs (e.g. Dropbox, Google Apps), document management, commenting, bulk uploading, Gantt charts, reporting capabilities, and more. It also includes some CRM/Pipeline Management Features. Clutter is reduced by collapsing many tasks…
$20
per month
Pricing
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Editions & Modules
Standard
$7
Per User Per Month
Premium
$14
Per User Per Month
Free
Free
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Projecturf
$20.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Considered Both Products
Jira Software

No answer on this topic

Projecturf
Chose Projecturf
-JIRA does a better job tracking time and analyzing than Projecturf.
-JIRA has a task board for good visualization.
-But Projecturf is cleaner and more user friendly than JIRA.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Jira Software
-
Ratings
Projecturf
8.6
3 Ratings
11% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings4.92 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings8.32 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings6.62 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Jira Software
-
Ratings
Projecturf
9.7
2 Ratings
23% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
Mattermost
Mattermost
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(180 ratings)
9.6
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(35 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
4.8
(27 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.3
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(41 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.7
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jira SoftwareProjecturf
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
The Jira software works well for managing scrum boards and allocating resources to a task. When your Epics and Issues are set up properly, it can give you a good idea of where your team stands and the trajectory of your project. It is not the ideal solution if you need to provide documentation and support to people outside of your product teams or organization. It would benefit from having a public documentation or repository feature.
Read full review
Projecturf
It is appropriate for team tasks. It is not appropriate for us to use a medical scheduling tool for our participants.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Agile software development management and micromanagement with Scrum and Kanban.
  • Agile planning and agile management with Kanban boards and custom boards, for projects and daily work.
  • Agile and old-school bug tracking.
  • Helpful reports on work done, workload, time tracking, Scrum sprints, planned vs. executed, etc.
  • Super friendly setup on the cloud, with just one Gmail account (less than 2 minutes).
  • Powerful on-premise alternative for large companies.
  • You can mergen boards from different workflows!
  • Really free full edition for 10 users.
Read full review
Projecturf
  • Manages files and communication
  • Allows us to track tickets
  • Ensures we have tasks clearly outlined with timelines
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • Management of the software is very difficult at times, although has improved.
  • Ability to manage resources is really non-existent, there are some plugins but they are ALL buggy (I've tested them all).
  • Better integration with Trello, would love to see this happen. Right now it's very clumsy.
Read full review
Projecturf
  • From what I understand, there was no good way to tracking the time it took to complete tasks and a way to evaluate all that data.
  • Sometimes, when a team member thought they posted something on the notes module it is never viewable by other members.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
While there are no fundamental problems with JIRA, I'm unsure that I will be working myself very closely with users of Atlassian Confluence. The client base I am concerned with tend to be more integrated with Amazon, IBM BlueMix / Watson, open source LAMP/PHP (WordPress, MediaWiki) & those that rely on more proprietary CMS would tend to use Sharepoint not Confluence. JIRA seems to me to stand or fall with the rest of the Atlassian silo or suite, as it is not closely integrated with Sharepoint or mediawiki based reporting or knowledge management. Data interchange standards in this area are weak so Microsoft, open source LAMP projects using Phabricator, and Atlassian JIRA seem to be three distinct silos, with Amazon, Google & IBM offering their own tools for similar needs.
Read full review
Projecturf
I am not in the position to choose our project management software, and my current company has already used our current software for a number of years. But if I were to ever use project management software for personal projects with remote team members then I think Projecturf would be a great contender for the job.
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
JIRA Software is a pretty complex tool. We have a project manager for JIRA who onboarded us, created our board, and taught us the basics. I think it would have been pretty overwhelming to learn without her. JIRA offers so much functionality that I'm not aware of -- I constantly need to Google or ask others about existing features. Also, although they are all under the Atlassian umbrella, I find it difficult to switch between JIRA Software and Confluence.
Read full review
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atlassian
Our JIRA support is handled internally by members of our Product Support team. It is not supported by a 3rd party. Our internal support will always sent out notifications for downtime which is usually done on the weekend unless it is required to fix a bug/issue that is affecting the entire company. Downtime is typically 3-4 hours and then once the maintenance is complete, another broadcast email is sent out informing the user community that the system is now available for use.
Read full review
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Atlassian
One of their strong points i stheir documentation. Almost all of the basic set up needed within JIRA is available online through atlassian and its easy to find and very precise. The more critical issues need to be addressed as well and hence the rating of 8 instead of a 9.
Read full review
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Take your time implementing Jira. Make sure you understand how you want to handle your projects and workflows. Investing more time in the implementation can pay off in a long run. It basically took us 5 days to define and implement correctly, but that meant smooth sailing later on.
Read full review
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
Jira Software has more integrations and has more features than many of its competitors. While some of its competitors do have better UI/UX than Jira Software, they have improved this greatly over time. Atlassian also acquired Trello years ago, so that adds better user interfaces to the system. They do also offer a pretty in-depth library of how to customize the platform that others don't.
Read full review
Projecturf
It is very good against its competition. We have used tools like Asana, Basecamp, Wrike and Trello, and it outpaces all of them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • Jira has positively made our company's daily activities much better organized
  • With Jira we can track progress and follow up on tasks
  • Jira has great reporting tools which aggregate various data and give us a good overview of our teams capacity
Read full review
Projecturf
  • Saves us time
Read full review
ScreenShots