Jupyter Notebook vs. Python IDLE

I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.

Incentivized

IDLE is a good option to run small scripts directly on the console, and that's it. It is a good exit when you don't want or need to open a proper IDE like Pycharm.

Incentivized

• Simple and elegant code writing ability. Easier to understand the code that way.
• The ability to see the output after each step.
• The ability to use ton of library functions in Python.
• Easy-user friendly interface.

Incentivized

• Firstly, I would say Python IDLE interface is user friendly.
• Easy to learn for the beginners.
• Syntax highlighting is nice features.
• Smart indent helps a lot.

Incentivized

• Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
• Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.

Incentivized

• Too simplistic
• Could not find source revision management integration support
• Only basic debugging is available
• Does not have data-science-specific notebooks (but can be installed separately)

Incentivized

Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.

Incentivized

The IDE Python IDLE is a good place to start as it helps you become familiar with the way Python works and understand its syntax.

This IDE allows you to configure the environment, font, size, colors, .....

It also looks like any simple text editor for any operating system, I work with Windows or Linux interchangeably, and you don't have to learn to use the IDE before programming.

Once the IDE is executed you can start programming directly in it.

Incentivized

I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.

Incentivized

Python IDLE support is what the community can give you. As it is free software, it does not have support provided by the manufacturer or by third-parties.

In any case, for most of the problems that normal users can find, the solution, or alternatives, can be found quickly online.

As this IDE is made in Python, the support is the same group of Python developers.

Incentivized

With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.

Incentivized

It's easy to set up and run quick analysis in Python IDLE on my local machine. The output is direct and easy to read. But sometimes I prefer Jupyter Notebook when the datasets are large, since it would take too long to run on my local machine. It is easier to run Jupyter Notebook on my cloud desktop

Incentivized

• Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
• Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
• Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration

Incentivized

• In a short time, we were able to develop several ML models for various teams to make accurate decisions.
• Beginners can easily understand and adapt to GUI.
• We could automate several manual validation tasks and so could reduce human intervention.

Incentivized