IBM Video Streaming vs. Kaltura

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Video Streaming
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
IBM Video Streaming solutions are used to stream virtual events, executive town halls, video marketing product launches, and OTT streaming. According to IBM, the solution is built for privacy, reliability and scale, to optimize video quality, and powered by IBM Watson AI for video search and automated closed captioning. IBM Enterprise Video Streaming can power security-rich video communications ranging from employee town halls, to trainings and…N/A
Kaltura
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Kaltura, headquartered in New York, offers enterprise or large scale video storage, streaming, and distribution supporting a variety of purposes such as streaming, enterprise video portal, interactive video and virtual classroom, or podcasting.N/A
Pricing
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsVideo Streaming edition is available for purchase via credit card online (or via IBM salesperson if needs exceed those outlined in the online plans). Enterprise Video Streaming edition must be purchased from an IBM salesperson.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Considered Both Products
IBM Video Streaming
Chose IBM Video Streaming
The main reasons I would recommend Ustream over other competitors are: SSO integration, how accessible/responsive support is, the ease of use for the viewer, the consumption/seat model is easy to understand, server side encoding to multiple bitrates/qualities, ability to …
Kaltura

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
6.1
70 Ratings
16% below category average
Kaltura
7.5
5 Ratings
5% above category average
Lead generation6.936 Ratings5.72 Ratings
Video personalization10.066 Ratings10.04 Ratings
eCommerce1.731 Ratings5.72 Ratings
Support for advertisements6.925 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Video SEO5.128 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Integration to Marketing Automation6.37 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
7.6
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Kaltura
7.3
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Integration to Salesforce.com6.42 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Integration to LMS8.72 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Integration to Marketo00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Integration to Eloqua00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
9.0
96 Ratings
3% above category average
Kaltura
8.3
7 Ratings
5% below category average
Video access controls9.083 Ratings8.57 Ratings
User management9.079 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Video link sharing10.093 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Internal video9.076 Ratings8.76 Ratings
External video8.081 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
7.8
95 Ratings
7% below category average
Kaltura
7.8
6 Ratings
7% below category average
Player customization6.179 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Embedded videos7.082 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls9.092 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Mobile compatibility9.087 Ratings5.76 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
8.2
87 Ratings
9% above category average
Kaltura
6.4
5 Ratings
16% below category average
A/B testing5.812 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Streaming quality reports8.070 Ratings6.43 Ratings
Per viewer tracking9.078 Ratings6.45 Ratings
Per video tracking9.077 Ratings6.45 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard9.081 Ratings6.75 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
9.0
96 Ratings
6% above category average
Kaltura
8.1
7 Ratings
5% below category average
On-Demand video9.067 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Live streaming9.095 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network9.079 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Video upload & format support9.081 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Video library / File management9.084 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Video portal9.065 Ratings8.56 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
IBM Video Streaming
9.0
64 Ratings
11% above category average
Kaltura
7.0
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Audience polling9.037 Ratings6.42 Ratings
Audience Q&A / Live chat9.061 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Video comments9.050 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Small Businesses
Wistia
Wistia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Wistia
Wistia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.6 out of 10
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.6 out of 10
Panopto
Panopto
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(126 ratings)
7.8
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.9
(8 ratings)
6.3
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(62 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(9 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.1
(60 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.6
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Video StreamingKaltura
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
The teacher uses IBM Video Streaming to record and upload instructional videos on various subjects, such as math problem-solving techniques or grammar lessons. Students watch these videos at home as homework and then apply what they've learned in class through collaborative projects and hands-on activities. This approach allows the teacher to spend more time providing individual support where needed.
Read full review
Kaltura
Kaltura is an excellent tool IF you have a large library of content. It can be pretty pricey so if you are early in launching an online program you may be better off waiting a few years until you've amassed a large enough catalog to warrant the investment in such a tool. The tool is best purchased by a University or company-wide vs having a single department try to find the budget for it. The unlimited plan pays for itself in most cases if you go this route. Secondly, you must be willing to invest time and resources into on-going training for your faculty and staff, especially for those who wish to create their own media and use the quizzing features.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • It allows us to stream without special equipment. We mainly use our phones.
  • The quality of the videos is amazing and I love the fact that videos auto-save and you can download and edit them for later.
  • The program allows you to create playlists so that we can stream on our online channel 24/7
Read full review
Kaltura
  • Very easy to use interface for uploading videos or capturing a screen recording. There are very few clicks required to get the media up and running. The video conversion process that happens on the back-end is fast and provides videos in device agnostic formats.
  • Integrates well with other systems, such as our Moodle LMS. This extends the capabilities of the LMS and also allows us to keep video/multimedia content organized in a central location (the KMC).
  • Kaltura can be connected to various processes within your organization. For example, we have a system in place that allows a video lecture in a classroom to be uploaded to Kaltura in a very easy manner.
  • User/role management is very important as some people on campus have more privileges to publish content than do others. We have Kaltura connected to our Single Sign-On solution for authentication and we can assign roles to specific people within the Kaltura software.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Occasionally, we experience a form of static that lasts for about 1 to 2 minutes. It appears in the live stream and in the auto-recorded file, but not in the live worship assembly. It occurs roughly 1 in every 4 hours of webcast time. I wish there was a way to trace the source of that recurring static. The diagnostic tools could be more robust.
  • It would be nice if the chat room allowed a user photo/avatar for each user to personalize that a little more.
  • I have wished for a way that an admin could use a “laser pointer” on the video window to point out something on the feed that other live viewers could see.
  • It would be wonderful to have a mini-tutorial for viewers who are not technically savvy that would inform them of how to get to the site and explain how they can use the software. For example, how they can see and type in the chat room, how to maximize the screen and make it smaller. Some of our viewers are in nursing homes or otherwise limited in capability to learn to use this on their own.
Read full review
Kaltura
  • As it relates to the LMS integration, we would like to see improved workflow. But that may be just as much a Canvas issue as a Kaltura issue.
  • I would like to see the ability to add inline, anchored comments to the video timeline.
  • We are seeing issues with compatibility with certain browsers - especially Chrome. The faster Kaltura can move away from Flash the better.
  • The capture appliance (CaptureSpace Lite) needs to be reconsidered. It's not intutive enough.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Our organization depends heavily on this streaming service. Now that we have the option of allowing our clients to attend meetings virtually, we can never retract that option as so many of our clients love the flexibility. Also, we have no complaints with the service itself. It is reliable and dependable and any issues we have encountered have never been to blame on the service but rather our lack of knowledge of it or needing to update our embed code
Read full review
Kaltura
The choice to renew our subscription does not belong to us, though we are able to provide input. We are aware of competitive products who have matured in the past three years, and we are aware now of alternatives to conventional plugin usage (LTI).
Read full review
Usability
IBM
The user interface is pretty straightforward, but simply needs optimization. (Please hire a seasoned UX person to fix it.) However, all of the key features are there and understandable. It's a great platform overall, a bit expensive, and could use some more options for its viewing experience, and a better "smart" embedding window for mobile applications.
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Absolutely. We have never had an outage problem or any application errors that I have been privy to. We are duly notified generally in advance of outages or updates
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
As we use it now, we are satisfied with the streaming performance. I cannot speak to integration yet as we have yet to engage in that but have plans to in the future
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
We funded 'white glove' service as our timelines were tight and our needs were well-defined. Tier 1 and Tier 2 support were able to help us get up and running in shorter order than we would have on our own. Documentation on the eCDN product had gaps, increasing the time to resolve and created concerns about success.
Read full review
Kaltura
The first line support agents seldom are able to diagnose or troubleshoot any problems that we have. These agents simply open support tickets in their system which are escalated to a foreign level 2 support agent which creates at least a day delay between reporting a problem and getting initial feedback. Any back-and-forth questions add at least another day delay.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
Ustream is easy to implement. It takes any stream we have thrown its way and distributed it quickly and with quality. When talking to others that are pursuing live stream implementations, I often remind them that the technology used to distribute your live stream is less important than the quality of the content you are distributing. Taking care to use the right camera equipment, the proper encoder, and quality sound gear will result in a high-quality stream that will allow the strength of the Ustream CDN to shine.
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Vimeo offers better tools for on-demand like chapters and marketing tools. But their live options are limited to event durations. YouTube can stream for longer durations but IBM 24/7 stream has been much more reliable and easy to use.
Read full review
Kaltura
Kaltura was the best option given the sheer volume of people we needed to support digitally. Others were better in their own regard, but due to limitations in number of attendees or sessions, Kaltura was the best option
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
IBM global network.
Read full review
Kaltura
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Our ROI is measured by the provision of ministry and satisfaction of our congregation. We are extremely pleased with our USTREAM and feel that it is a valuable asset to our church.
Read full review
Kaltura
  • Managing video content with the KMC has greatly reduced the amount of hours previously needed to manage.
  • User issues ie: uploading video, viewing video has been greatly reduced.
  • Increased user engagement with using video in LMS courses. We currently have 6,929 videos on our system. Last month , 2/1/14, 17,623 videos were viewed at least 75% of the way through.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Video Streaming Screenshots

Screenshot of the viewer's portal experience (channel page).Screenshot of how the automatically generated closed captions can be edited if necessary.Screenshot of the Analytics Console.Screenshot of the Watson Media CMSScreenshot of the viewer's portal experience (channel page).