Likelihood to Recommend Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
In my experience, problems with them adding incorrect fees to pad their bills coupled with their unethical business practices such as locking you out from accessing your EMR at the drop of a hat prevent me from recommending Kareo to any practice. Reliability is paramount. Kareo's use of unethical business practices (locking you out from your EMR or disabling your EMR all together) can result in a physician being sanctioned by the medical board (inappropriate medical record keeping) or financially destroy a small practice leaving them with NO ACCESS to their ERAs/patient billing accounts etc leads me to NOT reccomend their products or doing business with them.
Read full review The best scenario [is] that it has [a] particular object which can directly store the records of the client [who] has purchased the policy and practitioner details with [their] expertise. The users can directly book the appointment using LWC or Aura components which can be exposed on websites. The object will be linked with each other [using] a lookup relation which creates a complete framework to handle the cases and details of the clients, [their] policies, and other details as well. Booking or finding a practitioner can be done with the [
Salesforce ] Health Cloud app where it can use [your] current location and provide details of [available] nearby doctors. Health Cloud supports live agent as well where a user can get the details on his insurance policy and get other help if he need from the chat option with live agent.
Read full review Pros Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
Kareo stays up to date on insurance changes which allow for smooth transitions. Kareo asks for feedback and has a place to go and request changes or additions that would make our job easier. I love that you can submit a help ticket or call, if you prefer, with any questions or problems that you may have. They are always very prompt with their follow up. Read full review [There] are particular objects such as person accounts which [are] linked with [health care company accounts if they have a policy]. We have flows and pages where a user or client can book [their] appointment with a practitioner and get instant help by raising a case or request for [an] appointment. [Salesforce] Health Cloud keeps all the records of clients and practitioners and can link them when and where ever needed. Objects in the managed package have [a] standard field which gives a perfect solution with out-of-the-box functionality without creating such a model or structure. We can raise cases or requests and [use] automation tools like flows [so] the case will be assigned to [a] practitioner or the queue of the user. Read full review Cons Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
I've spent hours on the phone discussing various issues with regards to data variance between two different source documents within the software. At one point, I could not reconcile the A/R balance on one of the dashboards to the A/R balance pulled from the Excel add-in. Unfortunately, their support teams were not able to help out with this. The Excel add-in falls short in a few key areas. Specifically, they do not provide a simple method of joining data fields from the "charges," "payments," and "transactions" tables. One is left to attempt to join the data sets via VLOOKUP or INDEX(MATCH). At times, we have had issues with the API providing information that would not tie out to figures reported elsewhere within the software. Unfortunately, their support teams were not able to help out with this. Read full review They can have standard pages or components which can directly be used to book or record the appointment with the practitioner. [I believe] there is nothing more that [Salesforce] Health Cloud can improve as already everything comes under automation, from [booking] to service issues, everything is automated. Read full review Alternatives Considered Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
We are much happier with Kareo than Compulink. The software as a service makes it easy to manage claims from multiple locations when I cannot be on site. The reports and all other aspects I have mentioned as distinct to Kareo. We had a very hard time tracking things with Compulink.
Read full review When it comes to Health Cloud in other CRM we have to create the related object and fields and we have to set [up] a complete architecture for the healthcare business to run over the CRM. But here
Salesforce is proving a managed package, which is Health Cloud, has the framework already built we just [have to] use the standard functionality and get our task with automation done. This has definitely reduced the effort of developers as well as the agents who are working on the Health Cloud. [Even] a person with very little coding skill can use this CRM and get [their] task cases, etc. automated and [the] perfect solution can be built with low efforts.
Read full review Return on Investment Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
Kareo had an overall low return on investment. Despite the software being active at our company, we were forced to transition to a different solution within 6-months of implementation. The time spent attempting to reconcile the system to itself was rather wasteful. Read full review Definitely, [the ability] to handle [a] large number of users, [Salesforce Health Cloud] serves the best solution to the healthcare industry. [The] best part is that it is cloud-based technology where data and records will always be ready for use and there is minimal chance of losing the data. It has reduced the efforts of the agents to book appointments or find the right practitioner which saves time [for] both the agent as well as the client. There are automation tools [that] are used to send emails for reminders of policies. Issues of people can be handled when a case is created and it gets assigned to a user or queue of users to get the issue resolved asap. Read full review ScreenShots