Koofr vs. Wasabi Object Storage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Koofr
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Koofr, from the Slovenian company of the same name, is presented as a safe and simple way to store, backup and share documents, music, photos, and videos, so users can access data anytime and anywhere.N/A
Wasabi Object Storage
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Wasabi Technologies headquartered in Boston offers "hot cloud storage," object storage available pay-as-you-go as well as reserved capacity storage which they describe as tier free, and easily manageable. Additionally, Wasabi offers a Cloud NAS option, designed to be "hands free" and require minimal effort from administrators while having no impact on users and applications.
$5.99
per month per TB
Pricing
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Koofr
9.6
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Wasabi Object Storage
-
Ratings
Versioning10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
File search9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
Koofr
10.0
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Wasabi Object Storage
-
Ratings
User and role management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
File organization10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Device management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
Koofr
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Wasabi Object Storage
-
Ratings
Performance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reliability9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Reports9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
Small Businesses
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 10.0 out of 10
Amazon S3 Glacier
Amazon S3 Glacier
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloud Block Storage
IBM Cloud Block Storage
Score 9.2 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Block Storage
IBM Cloud Block Storage
Score 9.2 out of 10
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
KoofrWasabi Object Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
Koofr
Koofr works as a kind of system for data filtering, which interconnects the company's clouds through different pages and services, which helps to be used in processes of information collection of any kind, and that is on different platforms so that accessing it is easy. Saving all kinds of information in the cloud of our preference is something simple to achieve if we use Koofr as the main backup software, since the platform allows us to run the largest possible number of backups depending on the plan. So, it is useful for the management of massive backups in several clouds. It adapts very well to the formats of mobile devices, which allows us to access our information stored in the clouds regardless of the site in which we are working, and lets us work in conjunction with file sharing platforms also from cell phones.
Read full review
Wasabi, Technologies, Inc
If you have a huge collection of files where they are unlikely to change over time, like videos and photos, then Wasabi is a great place to back things up.
Read full review
Pros
Koofr
  • When using Koofr we generally evaluate the analytics of each cloud we decide to work with to store data, and based on this, we can choose whether to use it or not depending on its level of security and information encryption - since we want to access the data easily, but without having problems with intrusions.
  • The platform allows us to make comparisons between the quality of one service and another so that we can know which clouds are the most convenient to work with, and depending on the results, these are interconnected to our other clouds in a short time.
  • The scope achieved through Koofr is very extensive: we can schedule backups in the cloud well in advance, so it is completely unnecessary to carry out such copies without the need to run the operations manually.
  • In terms of adaptability capabilities to office software, Koofr is perhaps the best structured service to store in the cloud the documentation work that is managed through platforms such as Microsoft Word, which requires higher levels of complexity in terms of document configuration.
  • The plans that Koofr offers can be configured depending directly on the level of space required, so prices vary in relation to the amount of information that needs to be sent to the cloud, leaving aside the fixed monthly payments for a predetermined amount of space.
Read full review
Wasabi, Technologies, Inc
  • AWS S3 compatible APIs.
  • Supports custom policies and sub-accounts.
  • Much cheaper when compared to AWS S3.
Read full review
Cons
Koofr
  • The connection and saving capacity that we will have from Koofr depends directly on the type of plan we choose to work with, and this can make it quite difficult to upload a certain amount of large or heavy formats to several clouds at once.
  • Koofr's platform is not sufficiently adaptable to streaming services generally, and this makes it difficult to work with cloud copies of the streaming presentations we make on platforms like Twitch or YouTube, which limits our ability to view them in the future.
  • If you work with many devices, the Koofr platform usually presents problems to synchronize them all, and displays the information in the cloud depending on the connection speed of each device involved, which causes that some do not have the same accessibility to the information as others.
Read full review
Wasabi, Technologies, Inc
  • There is no central dashboard where you can see how much storage is used across all buckets.
  • The minimum storage time is three months.
  • They charges a minimum of 1TB of storage.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Koofr
No answers on this topic
Wasabi, Technologies, Inc
Wasabi is a tiny bit more expensive than Backblaze B2 ($5.99 vs $5 per TB per month), and there are minimum storage size/time requirements (1TB, 3Mo), but Wasabi has free traffic each month up to the size of storage which can save you a lot of money.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Koofr
  • There have been no drawbacks when calculating the company's overall ROI. Because we have generally expanded our storage capacity with Koofr, we have been able to work better.
  • The gains with Koofr have been varied, as they depend directly on the amount of work to be stored in the cloud, which seasonally turns out to be small.
Read full review
Wasabi, Technologies, Inc
  • For backing up files it is a great solution
  • They provide free traffic for up to the storage size each month making recovery of files much easier
  • The cheaper price and easy to start APIs are great
Read full review
ScreenShots