Laiye RPA vs. Oracle BPEL Process Manager

Laiye RPA is suited in repeating and stable business processes which are rule driven, such as finance, human resource, tax report, logistics (stock in and stock out), sales orders to account receivable, and purchase orders to account payable, and etc. It is not appropriate in situation where flexibility is required to complete tasks, or human to human communication is a key factor.

We found it to be most useful when developing workflows based on several disparate applications. Our end user reporting was, frankly, disorganized and there was no apparent logic system to how the process ought to function. As we had made the move to adopt Oracle and its suite of programs as our standard, it made cross functionality/integration very easy for our IT development team as well.

Incentivized

• Very stable, avoid the embarrassment of system crash.
• The cost of learning is very low, ready to use.
• Rich tutorial, easy to expand different scenes.

• Very user friendly and easy to use. The drop and drop feature makes it a breeze to create different system operations.
• Integration with other Oracle applications is a cinch and the visibility into IT is also very accessible.
• Much faster development time, especially when writing a process from scratch.

Incentivized

• Language capabilities improvement including Mongolian.

• We used cross reference tables frequently at my company which is currently not supported through Oracle BPEL. Adding this functionality would be very beneficial.

Incentivized

Besides the competitive pricing, I really feel its OCR feature is one of a kind and a major distinguishing factor which gives Laiye RPA an upper hand against other RPA vendors whose OCR features are a little weak in comparison. A further differentiator is the low-code factor that has allowed us to scale easily across the company.

• Improve work efficiency
• Improve customer satisfaction
• Reduce the error probability of data entry

• Reporting time decreased in many cases by up to several hours as much of what we had been doing was manual or time consuming.
• Reports themselves were faster based on the application processes we developed as well as the end user retrieval of said reports.

Incentivized