MACAW CRM vs. Tour de Force CRM

MACAW integrates well with Salesforce. As they say, they manage leads, opportunities, quotes and policies well. The underwriting and rating engines can be integrated if it's required. MACAW is a great solution for combining multiple systems into one and lowering overhead. It is not a great fit for non-technical departments.

Incentivized

Tour de Force can be very useful if you have someone on staff to configure and set it up. It needs constant upkeep with changes in what's needed, and constant updates. This would not be good for small businesses that do not have a sales teem. They charge heavily for tech support.

Incentivized

• Blending of CRM within an insurance flow
• Great Lead Management, Quotation and Underwriting
• High level support for marketing campaigns and setting up successful content strategies
• Great support for legacy back-office system

Incentivized

• We can quickly see Customers sales for the week, month, year, and past years.
• We can get deep into the data of a customers sales history and what they are or aren't buying.

Incentivized

• Not very user friendly
• Configuration with older back-office system is a bit of a hassle
• Searches and uploads sometimes take a long time

Incentivized

• There's too much data, and sales people have trouble finding what they need.
• It can be hard for IT or sales manager to manage all the data in an informational way.

Incentivized

MACAW provides deep integration with insurance-relevant tools, like underwriting and rating engines, which are not supported in shallow CRMs like Hubspot.

Incentivized

Tour de Force was less expensive than Sales Force, and has more abilities that Epicor CRM.

Incentivized

• Allowed work from home due to its web UI
• Made using legacy back-office system easier, except for more complex cases
• Not user friendly and a bit hard to onboard into

Incentivized

• Better customer visibility.
• We have better customer rating for finding top and bottom customers based on orders.

Incentivized