MaritzCX vs. MindTouch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MaritzCX
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
MindTouch
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
MindTouch is a customer experience management platform with content management and help authoring capabilities. Formerly known as MediaWiki, it is optimized for building knowledge bases for customer self-service and agent assistance purposes.N/A
Pricing
MaritzCXMindTouch
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MaritzCXMindTouch
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
MaritzCXMindTouch
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
MaritzCX
6.0
1 Ratings
26% below category average
MindTouch
-
Ratings
Survey templates7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Themes6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom logo/branding5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
MaritzCX
8.0
1 Ratings
7% below category average
MindTouch
-
Ratings
Changes to live survey6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Question design help9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple question types9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
MaritzCX
7.0
1 Ratings
17% below category average
MindTouch
-
Ratings
Survey logic flexibility7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
MaritzCX
6.8
1 Ratings
19% below category average
MindTouch
-
Ratings
Response tracking8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data export5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
MaritzCX
7.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
MindTouch
-
Ratings
Access controls5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
MaritzCX
5.0
1 Ratings
47% below category average
MindTouch
-
Ratings
Respondent restrictions5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MaritzCXMindTouch
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Sogolytics
Sogolytics
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Qualaroo
Qualaroo
Score 6.8 out of 10
CustomerSuccessBox
CustomerSuccessBox
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
PG Forsta HX Platform
PG Forsta HX Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quadient Inspire
Quadient Inspire
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MaritzCXMindTouch
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.6
(110 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(18 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(29 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(10 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(31 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(10 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(5 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.4
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
MaritzCXMindTouch
Likelihood to Recommend
MaritzCX
I think MaritzCX was a great option for internal and external surveys. I used it for feedback from clients who attended events. It gave me a clean report to show executive leadership about anything from venue, parking, food, and entertainment. It worked for event registration to save money using only one software. I used it for clients to sign up for events. Less of a clean report but works.
Read full review
MindTouch
If a company doesn't want to make their knowledge base public-facing, you lose a lot of the value of using MindTouch in a closed environment. MindTouch is not ideal for extremely structured content management scenarios that are strong DITA advocates. Companies that require localization might not be good fits either.
Read full review
Pros
MaritzCX
  • Easy to use format (not HTML coding knowledge required)
  • Detailed reports
  • Ability to save and re-use same themes and surveys
Read full review
MindTouch
  • MindTouch helps to easily organize our help articles to ensure that our end user is receiving the proper information.
  • The MindTouch platform is extremely easy to navigate which reduces the turnaround time for our team to publish new material.
  • The editor tools supplied through MindTouch make styling our documentation a breeze.
  • The contextual help tool allows our customers to consume documentation based on the page they are viewing in our platform.
Read full review
Cons
MaritzCX
  • Ability to customize look of survey limited
  • Some reports in CSV were a mess to fix up
  • Support seemed limited
Read full review
MindTouch
  • When we do have a support issue, we frequently need to go through multiple people, contacts, ways of explaining things, etc,. before someone on their end actually understands our problem. It's rare that the first person we talk to understands the big picture or appreciates our use case.
  • The draft functionality is a promising start but lacks some key features that cause us regular frustration. For example, you can only create one draft of a page at a time. This is fine if changes come to you in perfect sequential order, but it makes it impossible for us to update a live page while a draft exists. More specifically, if we're working on updating content on a page for a new feature being released next month, but then we notice a typo today, we can't fix the typo in production without first deleting the draft or doing some hacky workaround of temporarily copying/pasting the source HTML of the draft page and saving it someplace else.
  • Existence of, or integration with, true source control would be a huge win, but it's something currently lacking in the product. MindTouch's content reuse feature is helpful in the right situations, but it's not robust enough to scale well for lots of content.
  • Version history of page changes is not 100% reliable. Sometimes items don't show up at all or there is a delay before the diff is visible. Also, creating a draft does not register at all in the page version history.
  • In-site search is poor, unless you know the *exact* title of what you're looking for. We tell our customers to use Google, not the MindTouch search. Google is excellent at searching our MindTouch site.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
We've put lots and lots of content into the MindTouch system, of course, so that makes it harder to opt out, but we're also very pleased with their rate of development and weekly pushing of improvements, as well as their response and solutions to our questions and input All in all, a winning combination.
Read full review
Usability
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
The site is responsive across multiple devices and screens. It has a clear path to contact support. The articles are searchable. Site users do have trouble navigating the site and finding what they need. That may be due to the architecture of the site, but it'd be nice if MindTouch offered more solutions are this. Our content is organized by product line. And many of those product lines have overlapping training content, so we have extensive duplicate content.
Read full review
Performance
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
MindTouch is a hosted site, so as a heavy user there are times when I notice that pages are slow to load, or something happens like Amazon Web Services crashing the entire east coast for a few hours, that you do notice even if it isn't actually the fault of the MT tool itself. It's the risk of using a hosted tool, but the benefits are pretty amazing and outweigh these performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
It's good. Pretty solid. We got a lot of input to get up and running, but did a lot of the setup and customization work ourselves, because of our high standards. We've gotten good response and results on specific projects related to customization and our CSM is also pretty responsive. Overall, I think that the jobs of CSMs and support folks would be easier if the product weren't wonky in some ways. They seem to have to do more "workarounds" for basic functionality that should just work out of the box
Read full review
Online Training
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
Written documentation and videos are very good and have helped on numerous occasions when I've had to look up how to accomplish a certain task. The reason I have not given a full score is mainly because there have been some inaccuracies in the documentation because updates to the MindTouch framework have slightly changed the way things work. But this is usually the same type of challenges I face when making documentation for the software solution we develop. So all in all I'm very satisfied with both the personal webinars and the online documentation MindTouch provides for their service.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
Just know that there is so much more involved than adding your content. There are so many pieces to launching your site -- especially if you are moving from another platform. If you are not a person who typically works in the "website" realm, do your homework, ask your web people, engineers, etc., because there's a lot to do that you won't know about until you are unexpectedly smacked in the face with it. Learn from my mistakes! We are very happy now, but it was a long road getting to launch day for us
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
MaritzCX
MaritzCX was actually to only survey software I have used. No comparison to describe in this section
Read full review
MindTouch
I will be brief. DealerTeam is built upon Salesforce and we try to support native apps. We used Desk.com first for basic Help Ticket management. The product did not satisfy how our customers were looking for information. We upgraded to Service Cloud with Knowledge Base and spent one year writing content and developing our support agency. Again, our customers were upset about submitting help tickets and waiting for answers. They wanted access to self-help while working with a customer. Today we continue to use Service Cloud with MindTouch integration and have found complete success. There is simply no other solution I know of that is a flexible and easy to use as MindTouch when it come to providing customer success and product support
Read full review
Scalability
MaritzCX
No answers on this topic
MindTouch
We tried to migrate to MindTouch for 5 months and failed, remained with Zendesk
Read full review
Return on Investment
MaritzCX
  • Saved our department from needing to purchase additional event software
  • I was not responsible for actual purchase of MaritzCX
Read full review
MindTouch
  • Our operational efficiently has improved significantly. Prior to Mindtouch, we managing duplicate content in two separate authoring solutions. Delivering content predictably and consistently was difficult and stressful for writers. In Mindtouch, we were able to optimize our content (remove redundancies) giving us more time to test, review, and improve content quality.
  • Traffic to our knowledge center is increasing monthly.
  • Internally, SMEs and customer-facing teams are recognizing the value Mindtouch brings through self-service knowledge. These SMEs want to contribute more to content, either as contributing writers or collaborators with tech writers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MindTouch Screenshots

Screenshot of Content from MindTouch site visualized with Wave Analytics.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Whirlpool.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Conga.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Cisco Meraki.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Hitachi Data Systems.Screenshot of Example MindTouch implementation from customer Zuora.