Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Trellix Enterprise Security Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Stealthwatch is a network behavior analysis product based on technology acquired by Cisco with its Lancope acquisition in 2015.N/A
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager (formerly McAfee Enterprise Security Manager) is security information and event management (SIEM) software.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
-
Ratings
Trellix Enterprise Security Manager
8.4
9 Ratings
7% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings8.69 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings8.39 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings9.37 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings9.39 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings7.72 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.6 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.6 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(11 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(2 ratings)
6.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure Network AnalyticsTrellix Enterprise Security Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Few products operate off the Netflow or RAP/SPAN traffic versus the endpoint. Of those products, many operate from the aggregate traffic of uplinks/downlinks, whereas Secure Network Analytics focuses on viewing all traffic to give per-endpoint comprehensive data analytics. SNA is a great product for network visibility and detection, and to preserve that focus, other options such as remediation or quarantined are deferred to other products in the security ecosystem. SNA uses Machine Learning models to determine traffic behavioral compliance, which is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it mitigates zero day attacks changing traffic patterns, but conversely, it requires training to know acceptable traffic patterns. Unfortunately, many adopters of SNA do not spend the time giving it the user input and so the ML models never gets the correct weights and parameters to work from.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
I believe that McAfee Enterprise Security Manager is best-suited for anyone in an office setting with a computer containing sensitive information. McAfee Enterprise Security Manager is constantly working to make sure that your device is free from an threats. Our field workers, however, probably wouldn't have a need for McAfee Enterprise Security Manager. They do not use computers for work and have no sensitive information stored in a work-related cloud.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • A silent tool.
  • A great way to get visibility of all the conversations of the network.
  • Easy to find out the internal and the external threats.
  • Easy to track performance.
  • Network monitoring is very easy to understand and control.
  • Attacks can be easily detected along with encrypted traffic.
  • Historic records of the attack and reports make it even better.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • McAfee Enterprise Security Manager has a large library of pre-made correlations that reduces the amount of work needed to make it functional.
  • This is a core McAfee product that is still getting support.
  • It has a substantial amount of compatibility and integration with other products.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • There are things that you can search for a particular type of traffic, but you cannot create an alert to alert on that type of traffic. An example of that is a particular encryption type. So like RC4 encryption is prohibited within DHS. I can search for traffic using it, but I can't create a rule alerting on that traffic type.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • The user interface is not the best, it is still based on Flash player (but they have plans to migrate to HTML5).
  • While the "user" interface is pretty straight forward, the management interface is fairly complicated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is a fantastic tool, but does require some setup and upkeep which may turn off smaller IT Security teams. However, once all the flows are set up and the product is functioning with the proper rules, the insight into your network is fantastic. For us, the product has a significant ROI and will be a product we keep up on.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Strong and complete tool which gives comprehensive methods to discover cyber security incidents and prevent data leakage. In case of common use of Cisco StealthWatch and Cisco ISE, you will receive [the] ability [to] not just discover cyber security incidents but also dynamically respond to them. This makes StealthWatch one of most valuable products through[out] [the] whole Cisco Security product portfolio.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
We haven't had too many issues with the uptime and availability of CSNA, but the application does have a lot of dependancies and we have seen issues after an upgrade that caused an outage for several hours.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
Overall winner because it exceeds our expectations by answering all our requirements and at the same time empowers our operations thru other built-in capabilities it has. Visibility is a key to security operations and Cisco StealthWatch really gives us a magnifying glass to check all logs in the network for threat intelligence and threat hunting.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager overall is a great tool. It is effective in today's setting, wherein lots of potential threats are lurking. Its operations within the network are seamless. Users won't even notice that a SIEM is working in the background. But in today's trend, most of the businesses is heading towards the migration to cloud, which McAfee should improve its integration with.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
Implementation of the product can be tedious, especially fine tuning its rules to customize it to your environment. However, after that is done, CSNA is a very useful and flexible product that would enhance the security posture of any corporate network.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
After integrating and developing a lot of security features in MF NNM, we were not able to meet the requirements from the customer. After the alternative research, we got to know about this Cisco Secure Network Analytics tool and after implementing the same, we finally were able to win CSAT. MF NNM had a support-related issue as well. It took more than a month to solve for couple of issues frequently. Whenever there is a problem or need their support, reaching out to them has always been a challenge.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
We selected McAfee Enterprise Security Manager because the pricing is competitive in the industry. It is very reliable. The vendor offers good support in real time. Offers the results that we have been looking for. The ability to get the logs may be of last 2 years in a matter of seconds. The ability to retain logs for a very long time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • It is a little pricey - in my organization, with budget cuts, I eventually had to replace it with an open source product (NTOP). While it works well for visibility, it simply isn't the same. If you can afford it, don't bother looking anywhere else - just get it.
  • Being able to detect, pivot out, and remmediate from one console was awesome.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Centralisation of events form NIDS/IPS/IDS, Firewall(s), Web Proxy and Endpoint
  • Ability to have third party management
  • Actively upgraded product with good vendor support
Read full review
ScreenShots