Tenable Security Center vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tenable Security Center
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
Pricing
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Considered Both Products
Tenable Security Center

No answer on this topic

Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Chose Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Security Center
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
7.8
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Tenable Security Center
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
8.2
2 Ratings
2% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(7 ratings)
8.7
(15 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(3 ratings)
10.0
(5 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tenable Security CenterTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Tenable
[Tenable.sc (formerly SecurityCenter)] does very well for internal scanning for vulnerabilities, however it needs to be combined with Tenable.io in order to do cloud scanning.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
[McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator] seems to be better suited to large enterprise applications... I don't feel it really suits the or self-managed SMB market. The general joe is not going to understand how to wield this product to it's full potential. For those of us managing large networks, this is a very ideal product for managing multiple sites and users.
Read full review
Pros
Tenable
  • Vulnerability management from one place
  • Maximum endpoint visibility
  • Easy to set up and plan the structure
  • Support desk quickly responses
  • Well-prepared documentation
  • Broad scanning type
  • Supports various compliance standards
  • User groups allows coordination between teams
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Static malware scans for known bad processes and files works well and can be schedules on endpoints easily
  • Preventing users from accessing USB drives and other peripherals is easily configured. We can also allow users to access to USB drives with user codes for the times they need it for business reasons.
  • ePO provides access into our MSME software so that we're not managing many different products from different locations.
  • In recent years the console has gotten much easier to navigate even though there is a ton of information to be accessed.
Read full review
Cons
Tenable
  • Centralized vulnerability management with sensors.
  • Network health assessment and Incident response.
  • For alerting or notification, it should also support the SMS gateway.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Because the company is evaluating other products.
Read full review
Usability
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
User friendly, what is the only point to be improved is about the inheritance of policies and tasks.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Outage only during upgrade... but not impact the environment.
Read full review
Performance
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No issues
Read full review
Support Rating
Tenable
On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Tenable
We decided to go with Tenable due to its robust reporting capabilities and competitive pricing vs its competitors. While all tools are very similar in regards to scanning capabilities we prefer Tenable SC's user interface. We also like the option to have both on-prem and cloud with theirs. Tenable io product as well.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
The time of renewal
Read full review
Scalability
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator is a great tool, and provide complete security with Endpoint Suite.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Tenable
  • Create internal/operational efficiencies
  • Improve compliance & risk management
  • Cost management
  • Solid vulnerability scanner
  • Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Peace of mind that your environment is safe and secure.
  • Keep your network environment up and running.
  • Additional resources (consulting or training) may be required if not familiar with the product.
  • Very complex to setup and configure ( training may be required).
  • Once configured, it will take care of almost 80% of your tasks.
Read full review
ScreenShots