Medrio vs. Veeva Vault PromoMats

Medrio is very user friendly and even allows the user to print out the eCRFs to be used as source documents. This makes creating source documents very easy for the Research team and the information directly matches the EDC, which makes the monitoring process go much smoother. The process for withdrawing a subject can be a bit confusing, as the system only allows for a "screen-failure" designation and not an option for withdrawal, or is lost to follow-up.

Incentivized

It's great for keeping us organized and on track with our projects.

Incentivized

• Ease of navigation for entering subject data.
• Very organized placement of eCRFs.
• Allows for accurate and efficient data collection.

Incentivized

• Document management
• Multi-agency notifications
• Approvals for appropriate teams

• The system does not allow a separate designation for screen failures that were lost to follow-up or who were withdrawn by the PI.
• When a subject is deemed a screen-failure, eCRFs are still expected to be filled out and it is unclear which ones unless otherwise directed by the in-house team.

Incentivized

• Ability to edit documents in Veeva
• More mobile friendly
• Perhaps an email approval ability

Incentivized

In my opinion, the interface is poor and in the last 4 years never improved

Incentivized

I have not had any technical issues with this product in the two years I've used it, which speaks for itself. I like how I am now able to use my email address to sign in instead of remembering yet another user name, this makes using this EDC a much more enjoyable experience.

Incentivized

Haven't tried any other products.

Incentivized

• Monitoring visits run much smoother due to the fact that eCRFs can be directly printed from the EDC.
• Information requested in the EDC is clear and concise and easy to understand.

Incentivized

• It has made our projects move smoother and quicker through the system so our time is more optimized.

Incentivized