OpenText ALM Octane vs. TestRail

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText ALM Octane
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
OpenTextâ„¢ ALM Octane, formerly from Micro Focus, includes integrated planning, continuous integration, test management, and release management. With these capabilities, it helps Agile teams and DevOps toolchains to deliver high-quality software with insight, traceability, analytics-focused end-to-end visibility, and continuous quality.N/A
TestRail
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.N/A
Pricing
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText ALM Octane
-
Ratings
TestRail
7.0
1 Ratings
14% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.3 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
7.4
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText ALM OctaneTestRail
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
If someone is already using ALM Octane, then it is worth the pain to go through the upgrade process to get the current versions. If you need it to tie into Jira, it can do that. Just be prepared for a rough road. If you have some other product that you use for DevOps, PM, and QA, you will probably be better off sticking with what you have. DaVita also uses TFS, but not in a full implementation (i.e. not with a build server for code deployment), so for them, ALM makes a lot of sense. If you are using TFS with a build server, there are other methodologies that won't end up making you want to pull your hair out trying to make it integrate with what you are using.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
The integration with other tools, and their user friendly layout and design. It's very comfortable to use and is way better than other tools with the Automation Testing tools, thanks to the great API that is included. Sometimes the integration with Jira is a little faulty, but the links to that tool usually work well. It could be cool if it had a better following for the bug items that were registered on other tools.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Bug-logging and keeping track of the bug status.
  • Integration with DevOps to do continuous testing.
  • Keeping coordination between development and testing teams.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Beautiful and productive UI.
  • Nice filtering system allowing me to find what I need quickly.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The integration to Synchronizer is very difficult to implement.
  • The integration to Jira was very hard to get working.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Integration with Jira seems [a] little faulty.
  • Increase the API call limit for different editions.
  • Better way to trigger automation suites from TestRail.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Customer support is very good takes minimal time to resolve the issue and always takes feedback seriously to improve the application.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Micro Focus ALM Octane use at DaVita goes back beyond my starting with them three years ago. They have used it as part of DevOps as well as for performance measurement of software releases in combo with HP Performance Center (a great combination). Jira is well suited to managing bug reports and development processes with Agile and Scrum, but ALM Octane goes above and beyond that.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and then pass/fail/send feedback is much faster when there is a test case created as I'm not reading through ticket description/comments to figure out what needs to be QA'd.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • It's had a very positive impact.
  • Very good customer support as well when required.
Read full review
IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
  • Improved test management process and collaboration inside team.
  • Increased transparency of QA work.
  • Team became more satisfied.
Read full review
ScreenShots