Fortify by OpenText vs. Sentinel Dynamic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fortify by OpenText
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
An AppSec solution formerly from Micro Focus, spanning SCA, SAST and DAST that supports the breadth and management of any application portfolio, used to secure code. Features API discovery and testing for any application, throughout the software lifecycle.N/A
Sentinel Dynamic
Score 3.0 out of 10
N/A
Sentinel Dynamic platform finds vulnerabilities in websites and web applications. It is a SaaS platform that, according to the vendor, can scale to meet any demand. It was developed by WhiteHat Security, which was acquired by Synopsys in June of 2022.N/A
Pricing
Fortify by OpenTextSentinel Dynamic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fortify by OpenTextSentinel Dynamic
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Fortify by OpenTextSentinel Dynamic
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Fortify by OpenTextSentinel Dynamic
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fortify by OpenTextSentinel Dynamic
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
SDLC deployment is simple. simple to use The coverage is thorough and complete as a DAST product.
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
Pros
OpenText
  • Detection of vulnerabilities
  • Scanning pipelines
  • Integration is super easy
  • Scanned cloud based applications
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
Cons
OpenText
  • Reporting could be better
  • Can be an involved setup if your organization is not using common build tools
  • Users get spammed with a lot of email updates from the service
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Since every firm needs to perform static code analysis on their applications, I believe Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect would work well for them (they also offer dynamic scanning, although I haven't used it myself). Different static analysis tools scan code in different ways, and Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect asks you to submit a complete build of the application along with debugging files. Depending on how your company builds its apps, this requirement may be simple or challenging.
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Always receive excellent support from the vendor. No issues there.
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Fortify Application Defender is a little more timely and upfront with a lot of their information on cyber security. we like what they provide and how they communicate with our users. I think they have a good understanding and practice in their field. they seem best suited for us and the best fit.
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • DevSecOps helped in reducing efforts
  • License cost was less
  • We could roll out double the count of applications with implementation of WebInspect
Read full review
Synopsys
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots