OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs. WebLOAD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LoadRunner Professional
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior.N/A
WebLOAD
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
WebLOAD from global, Israel-headquartered RadView Software, is an enterprise class load and performance testing tool.N/A
Pricing
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Considered Both Products
LoadRunner Professional
Chose OpenText LoadRunner Professional
The biggest point of using HP LoadRunner is the response time numbers captured after executing the tests were more accurate when we generated the same by using tools like JMeter or NeoLoad though it involves a certain licensing cost but what [we] needed was trust and accuracy …
WebLOAD

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
8.4
6 Ratings
0% below category average
WebLOAD
10.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
End to end performance management9.06 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Integrated performance data10.06 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.06 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Real time monitoring6.15 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection8.05 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(7 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText LoadRunner ProfessionalWebLOAD
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Micro Focus LoadRunner and its suite of tools, specifically VuGen works wonderfully for us for all web, http/https and web service calls. We've been able to build tests for near any scenario we need with relative ease. As long as we have crafted up requirements for our scenarios / scripts to managed scope, we've had high success working with scripting and data driving. Our main tests are web service calls - typically chained together to form a full scenario with transactions measuring the journey or a similar (measure along the way) journey through a browser. For web services we will use VuGen and browser we've shifted to Tru Client I have had little-to-no experience scripting against a thick client where a ui-driven test would be required. I know its possible but quite costly due to the need to run the actual desktop client to drive tests. We've been fortunate enough to leverage http calls to represent client traffic.
Read full review
RadView Software
WebLOAD is an imperative tool for our web manager and developers team. We rely heavily on this in our daily activities, mainly to run script testing (in record time) of new code prior to our build releases. This product helps us identify potential gaps and issues with the user flow and allows us to make adjustments and fix problems before they make it into the live production site. Our team also depends on this software to run multiple load testing of each server in preparation for heavy timeframes of the year, such as Cyber Monday, Black Friday, etc. Our team members brought up that they would love to see more scripting examples of how to use WebLOAD, which would make their job easier.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Read full review
RadView Software
  • Load testing of increased traffic during peak hours
  • Reporting of script runs before new code releases
  • Identifies issues and problems with the code before this makes it into the live site
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Read full review
RadView Software
  • The load time of running a testing script can be long at times
  • It would be helpful to have multiple users/ devices to run under one membership
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Read full review
RadView Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Read full review
RadView Software
There are many similar comparable products on the market, but with WebLOAD, the price point was reasonable. Their sales and engineering teams and very friendly and helpful and make our implementation a breeze. I would definitely renew our contract and recommend this to anyone out there looking for the best load-testing tool!
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Read full review
RadView Software
  • Increased ROI by discovering any performance issues ahead of time, and allowing us to fix them before making it into production.
  • Improved efficiencies with DevOps.
  • Increased productivity through the automated reports feature.
Read full review
ScreenShots