OpenText Silk Test vs. Rapise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Silk Test
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Formerly from Micro Focus, and earlier from Borland, OpenTextâ„¢ Silk Test automates functional testing for web, mobile, rich-client, and enterprise applications. Its collaborative test design helps business and technical stakeholders work together for a full range of test coverage.N/A
Rapise
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.
$799.99
Lifetime License per Seat
Pricing
OpenText Silk TestRapise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
5-License Pack
$799.99
Lifetime License per Seat
10-License Pack
$799.99
Lifetime License per Seat
Single License
$899.99
Lifetime License per Seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Silk TestRapise
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Silk TestRapise
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
OpenText Silk TestRapise
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Silk TestRapise
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Silk TestRapise
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
The appropriate scenario to use Rapise is when we have a project that is considered from medium onwards, since Rapise will help us to define, develop and implement the testing phase in a reliable and efficient way. Also with Rapise we will not have to worry about the platform that we are using since it has great versatility and flexibility.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
  • Simple recording front-end and easily captures UI objects for later interaction
  • Flexible programming interface provides a multitude of manners in which to interact with learned UI objects
  • Javascript based IDE is easy to learn
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
  • For tests that require specific approaches it is necessary to have advanced knowledge of programming in javascrip, which sometimes the QA team does not have experience
  • Sometimes I have noticed that when using object dragging errors occur intermittently
  • The integration with some tools (Dynamics) is only with the basic functions from my point of view
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
Mmuch better from a flexibility perspective
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
  • The primary objective of the institution is a service to the public, so everything that improves response times to the public helps us to achieve it.
  • As a department in charge of the development of systems and applications, our objective is fulfilled by delivering quality products and tools such as Rapise help us greatly
  • The return on investment can be more than justified by fulfilling the primary objectives
Read full review
ScreenShots

Rapise Screenshots

Screenshot of Testing DashboardScreenshot of Integrated Testing EnvironmentScreenshot of Reporting