Likelihood to Recommend SiteScope is definitely well suited in an HP server environment. It is also well suited for virtual server environments. It is also well suited for those who are happy with email and text based message alerting. It may not be appropriate in other environments where monitoring physical components is critical. Because HP SiteScope does not monitor certain physical components, it does fall short of being able to be a "one stop shop solution" in regard to monitoring. It is not well suited for those looking for logic in how alerts are sent and cascade to other people or groups.
Read full review I believe the scenarios we used it for were quite well covered, from the executive perspective. The downtime alarms worked very well and were easy to setup, uptime monitoring tools were clear and easy to use, even for non-technical people (C-level) and the SLA management tools allowed us to spend less time, and have less friction, with our clients
Read full review Pros Alerts can be configured as per business requirement. It can take remedial action, when defined for a particular situation. Severity, priority of tickets which are created upon a trigger can be well defined. The teams which need to be alerted can be configured in the tool itself, in case of any event. Read full review The alerts are very responsive offering quite detailed timing information The UI for reports is very clear and set up of reports is very intuitive Customer service was good when there were problems - e.g. lapsing billing causing reporting to go down Read full review Cons Sitescope is particularly used for infrastructure monitoring. Other kinds of monitors cannot be set using HP sitescope. Sitescope cannot have graphs like splunk which is why we have splunk as well which is an additional cost for the company. We can't have a direct regex operations on data inside HP sitescope. We need to have the logs placed as a single log and then do that. Read full review The PagerDuty integration could be a lot better. When you use the PagerDuty integration, it doesn't send any information about which check failed! It just sends a message like "Timeout (> 30s)" -- this isn't very helpful when we have hundreds of checks. We've worked around this by using both the PagerDuty and Slack integrations and having them both post to the same Slack channel. But this means that when an engineer is paged from PagerDuty, they have to go to Slack (or Pingdom) to find the details about the page; it's not available on the page itself. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Recently added features have made Pingdom less intuitive for our requirements. While Pingdom has a broad offering and remains a good value, it is becoming more than we need. Our customer base is becoming more and more global and Pingdom still lacks Asia-Pacific monitoring, which we will need within a year.
Ted White Sr. Mgr., Information Systems Production Operations
Read full review Usability Very straightforward and easy to use once you get past the short learning curve.
Read full review Pingdom is easy to use, very intuitive and has a very short learning curve. From the onset, we've been able to jump in and leverage the tool to accomplish our goals for page speed performance and discover the insights we need to make improvements. Its a well-designed tool and makes for a good user experience.
Read full review Performance Interface is unnecessarily complicated and frequently responds slowly.
Ted White Sr. Mgr., Information Systems Production Operations
Read full review Support Rating Can't really answer this. Setup was easy and no support has really been used at this point.
Read full review Support responded the same day to my query, as I was setting the product up but couldn't find the setting I needed. This was successfully resolved in a short time frame, so I was pleased with how quickly we were able to get this resolved. I haven't needed to contact support since.
Read full review Alternatives Considered SiteScope unified console is a powerful tool for operators to easily detect warnings and alerts grouped by its hierarchical organization with real-time status displaying continuously the whole health map.
Read full review PRTG Network Monitor was a far more complicated tool to use and set up albeit it does both Internal and External monitoring. The setup wasn't intuitive and there are too many configuration options to complete to form an alertAmazon CloudWatch is specific to AWS resources and cannot be easily use outside of the AWS EcosystemRead full review Return on Investment Sitescope does exactly what it was purchased for. It may take some time to set it up but once its set up it is a rock solid product. Read full review Honestly, we have 4 other products that overlap this functionality whose organizations provide far superior support. At this point it is an unnecessary expense. In my opinion, their lack of support responsiveness and commitment has impacted our IT agility. Its time to explore other alternatives. Read full review ScreenShots SolarWinds Pingdom Screenshots