Likelihood to Recommend from my point of view its usually suited for a project with 20 to 50 members in it. have more than that may cause issue. because of sharing will be difficult among more people
Read full review Polarion ALM shines where it is intended to be used: Application Lifecycle Management. It fits well with agile development concepts, but the extensive customization abilities allow it to adapt to other concepts, too. It is suitable as an all-in-one solution, which is capable of giving transparency over all related areas, be it Requirement Management, Test Management, Release Management, Defect Management, etc., to the involved stakeholders.
Read full review Pros Traceability - will allow you to see end to end how requirements are related to each other, to project artifacts, how the requirement was tested, and the implementation code (when using with Serena CM). Baselines - these are snapshots in time which are typically used at project phases and milestones. They allow you to see all aspects of a project from requirements to testing and how it has progressed or changed over time. Test Management - test steps, execution, defect management are all included in RM, providing a powerful SDLC management platform. Read full review Requirements Management: Polarion ALM provides a centralized repository for capturing and managing requirements. Teams can define, organize, and link requirements to other artifacts like test cases and development tasks. Test Management: Polarion ALM facilitates end-to-end test management. Teams can create detailed test cases, manage test execution, and track test results. Traceability and Impact Analysis: Polarion ALM ensures traceability across all phases of the development lifecycle. Users can establish links between requirements, test cases, development tasks, and other artifacts. This traceability helps in impact analysis, allowing teams to understand how changes in one area may affect other parts of the project. Customization and Adaptability: Polarion ALM is highly customizable to fit the unique needs of different organizations and industries. Users can create custom workflows, define custom fields, and adapt the tool to their specific development processes. Read full review Cons it is a centralized software so the issue is only one user can have access to software at a given point of time some times check-in and check out takes time its little difficult for newbies to understand and work with Read full review More robust engine as far as the actual took is concerned. There are navigation components in trace to reporting which we feel can be improved especially when dealing with cross global accessing of the tool. It slows us down a bit so it's backend driven optimization as well as some front end "clunkiness" that can be improved. Improve some filtering capabilities especially in creating custom reports and generally all around the ALM components of the tool. As of the version we have, the ability to enhance replationship types in traceability is limited. Read full review Likelihood to Renew There is too much at stake to go into a new system. But with everything else being promised as far as newer more innovative products, the justification to not renew is a huge risk so that is not a concern
Read full review Alternatives Considered Read full review Polarion ALM has the best usability, extensibility and reactiv product management. The support is also very good compared to other companies. Or in other words it is closer to the customer. Codebeamer is for sure also a good ALM tool with a great feature set, but existing customers are often neglected. We will see, what PTC as the new owner of codebeamer will change at this point.
Read full review Return on Investment management of requirement is much easier centralized access to all the document better user friendly experience Read full review Many of our customers have achieved things that they could not have done without Polarion Possibility to make engineering enjoyable and not so documentation oriented (especially in regulated industries) Automatic and all the time up-to-date reporting gives savings in time Information reuse is typically giving benefits in resource use and time-to-market. Up to 40% reduction in time-to-market seen. 10-20% reduction in R&D cost is typically achievable Read full review ScreenShots