Azure Machine Learning vs. Cloudera Data Science Workbench

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Machine Learning
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Machine Learning is and end-to-end data science and analytics solution that helps professional data scientists to prepare data, develop experiments, and deploy models in the cloud. It replaces the Azure Machine Learning Workbench.
$0
per month
Data Science Workbench
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Cloudera Data Science Workbench enables secure self-service data science for the enterprise. It is a collaborative environment where developers can work with a variety of libraries and frameworks.N/A
Pricing
Azure Machine LearningCloudera Data Science Workbench
Editions & Modules
Studio Pricing - Free
$0.00
per month
Production Web API - Dev/Test
$0.00
per month
Studio Pricing - Standard
$9.99
per ML studio workspace/per month
Production Web API - Standard S1
$100.13
per month
Production Web API - Standard S2
$1000.06
per month
Production Web API - Standard S3
$9999.98
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Machine LearningData Science Workbench
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Machine LearningCloudera Data Science Workbench
Considered Both Products
Azure Machine Learning
Chose Azure Machine Learning
It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved …
Data Science Workbench
Chose Cloudera Data Science Workbench
Both the tools have similar features and have made it pretty easy to install/deploy/use. Depending on your existing platform (Cloudera vs. Azure) you need to pick the Workbench. Another observation is that Cloudera has better support where you can get feedback on your questions …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Azure Machine LearningCloudera Data Science Workbench
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.5
2 Ratings
12% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.6
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Visualization00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.8
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
7.6
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Azure Machine Learning
-
Ratings
Cloudera Data Science Workbench
8.0
2 Ratings
7% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings7.82 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Machine LearningCloudera Data Science Workbench
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Machine LearningCloudera Data Science Workbench
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(2 ratings)
7.9
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Machine LearningCloudera Data Science Workbench
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For [a] data scientist require[d] to build a machine learning model, so he/she didn't worry about infrastructure to maintain it.
All kind of feature[s] such as train, build, deploy and monitor the machine learning model available in a single suite.
If someone has [their] own environment for ML studio, so there [it would] not [be] useful for them.
Read full review
Cloudera
Organizations which already implemented on-premise Hadoop based Cloudera Data Platform (CDH) for their Big Data warehouse architecture will definitely get more value from seamless integration of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (CDSW) with their existing CDH Platform. However, for organizations with hybrid (cloud and on-premise) data platform without prior implementation of CDH, implementing CDSW can be a challenge technically and financially.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • User friendliness: This is by far the most user friendly tool I've seen in analytics. You don't need to know how to code at all! Just create a few blocks, connect a few lines and you are capable of running a boosted decision tree with a very high R squared!
  • Speed: Azure ML is a cloud based tool, so processing is not made with your computer, making the reliability and speed top notch!
  • Cost: If you don't know how to code, this is by far the cheapest machine learning tool out there. I believe it costs less than $15/month. If you know how to code, then R is free.
  • Connectivity: It is super easy to embed R or Python codes on Azure ML. So if you want to do more advanced stuff, or use a model that is not yet available on Azure ML, you can simply paste the code on R or Python there!
  • Microsoft environment: Many many companies rely on the Microsoft suite. And Azure ML connects perfectly with Excel, CSV and Access files.
Read full review
Cloudera
  • One single IDE (browser based application) that makes Scala, R, Python integrated under one tool
  • For larger organizations/teams, it lets you be self reliant
  • As it sits on your cluster, it has very easy access of all the data on the HDFS
  • Linking with Github is a very good way to keep the code versions intact
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It would be great to have text tips that could ease new users to the platform, especially if an error shows up
  • Scenario-based documentation
  • Pre-processing of modules that had been previously run. Sometimes they need to be re-run for no apparent reason
Read full review
Cloudera
  • Installation is difficult.
  • Upgrades are difficult.
  • Licensing options are not flexible.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
Easy and fastest way to develop, test, deploy and monitor the machine learning model.
- Easy to load the data set
-Drag and drop the process of the Machine learning life cycle.
Read full review
Cloudera
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support is nonexistent. It's very frustrating to try and find someone to actually talk to. The robot chatbots are just not well trained.
Read full review
Cloudera
Cloudera Data Science Workbench has excellence online resources support such as documentation and examples. On top of that the enterprise license also comes with SLA on opening a ticket to Cloudera Services and support for complaint handling and troubleshooting by email or through a phone call. On top of that it also offers additional paid training services.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not sure
Read full review
Cloudera
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved usability even for non-specialist users.
Read full review
Cloudera
Both the tools have similar features and have made it pretty easy to install/deploy/use. Depending on your existing platform (Cloudera vs. Azure) you need to pick the Workbench. Another observation is that Cloudera has better support where you can get feedback on your questions pretty fast (unlike MS). As its a new product, I expect MS to be more efficient in handling customers questions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Productivity: Instead of coding and recoding, Azure ML helped my organization to get to meaningful results faster;
  • Cost: Azure ML can save hundreds (or even thousands) of dollars for an organization, since the license costs around $15/month per seat.
  • Focus on insights and not on statistics: Since running a model is so easy, analysts can focus more on recommendations and insights, rather than statistical details
Read full review
Cloudera
  • Paid off for demonstration purposes.
Read full review
ScreenShots