Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Formerly Microsoft Defender ATP vs Palo Alto Networks Threat Protection

• It is great at proactively monitoring threats across the network. It works seamlessly with the client to monitor individual user computers, and it has a good real-time scanning engine.
• On the client side, Windows Defender doesn't require a whole lot of system resources to run, nor will it create unnessary slowdowns of a computer, even while scanning for threats

Read full review

• Anti virus
• Vulnerability protection
• Anti spyware

Read full review

• Virus detection rates are below competitors.
• Too many notifications that end up bothering.
• Do not ask every time if you should send reports to Microsoft.

Read full review

• Sometimes I struggle to find the deny or specific traffic log for file blocking profile under Unified logs.
• Reporting around Threat Prevention suite could be much better.
• Possibly a specific threat prevention search function that spans across of threat features.

Read full review

• There is definitely a piece of mind provided when you know that your system will not get compromised because of malware and viruses.
• The fact that I don't have to spend money in the first place means that I can spend money on other more important things that do require it.

Read full review

• We have various compliance standards we have to meet and the Palo Alto with its Networks Threat Protection suite has checked off pretty much all the boxes we needed and at a price point that couldn't be easily beat for comparable features, throughput, etc.
• IT/Network staff has saved a A LOT of time using this platform for protection (coming from an ASA)

Read full review