Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
JD Edwards Enterprise is more robust than NetSuite or MSD GP. It has significantly more experience in the field. However, it's also an aging application and not nearly as agile as those two. I've also found resources to be less expensive with a broader knowledge of the …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
17 Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
11 Ratings
4% above category average
Pay calculation6.116 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Benefit plan administration7.012 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.016 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
25 Ratings
1% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
16 Ratings
10% above category average
API for custom integration7.024 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Plug-ins7.019 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.6
36 Ratings
19% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
21 Ratings
4% above category average
Single sign-on capability6.129 Ratings9.015 Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.136 Ratings8.021 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
37 Ratings
12% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
18 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards7.025 Ratings7.013 Ratings
Standard reports7.035 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Custom reports6.035 Ratings8.015 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
44 Ratings
10% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
23 Ratings
6% below category average
Accounts payable6.041 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Accounts receivable7.032 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Cash management6.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation6.137 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management7.027 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking7.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management6.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support7.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance6.111 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing7.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers7.018 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.022 Ratings8.017 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting6.114 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.014 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework6.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes7.015 Ratings7.019 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
24 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
16 Ratings
1% above category average
Inventory tracking7.022 Ratings7.016 Ratings
Automatic reordering6.012 Ratings8.012 Ratings
Location management8.017 Ratings10.014 Ratings
Manufacturing module6.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.7
22 Ratings
10% below category average
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
17 Ratings
8% below category average
Pricing6.016 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Order entry7.019 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Credit card processing7.011 Ratings6.88 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.022 Ratings8.113 Ratings
Order Orchestration8.07 Ratings9.08 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution6.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
21 Ratings
6% below category average
Billing Management00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.018 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings5.710 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.916 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings5.38 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings6.88 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings6.99 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings6.06 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings7.56 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
6 Ratings
25% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
6 Ratings
2% below category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
13 Ratings
1% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings4.36 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.55 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings7.23 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings7.83 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
10 Ratings
1% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings5.55 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
9 Ratings
7% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings4.86 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings4.38 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
13 Ratings
14% below category average
Forecasting00 Ratings5.410 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
7 Ratings
10% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Small Businesses
Dext Prepare (with Receipt Bank)
Dext Prepare (with Receipt Bank)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 8.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(50 ratings)
10.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(6 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
A large company where users have one function- for instance, where someone only receives or works in payables. That minimizes the number of windows they need. A smaller company where one user does multiple functions will require a lot more training and user knowledge to navigate, and it makes it harder to secure users. You also have to understand that GP started life as Great Plains, designed for accountants. The other modules were added on after Microsoft bought Great Plains, which means that modules like Manufacturing are red-headed step children with much smaller support ecosystems. So, if you're starting fresh, you may want to look at something built for the mobile world. D365 and Business Central are a lot more money, buggy, and hard to customize and essentially still vaporware. Microsoft is heavily investing there, leading to the previously mentioned question about the future of GP. If I was starting today I would be hard pressed to justify jumping into GP in a world where Salesforce ties in with so many programs. GP has MRP but it is limited so it's hard to justify a manufacturer starting with GP today.
Read full review
Oracle
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • User friendly interface
  • Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
  • One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The new versions (9.2) of JDE has so much open functionality and really gives the user control over the screens and what they want to see. Love that the layout of the screen is really up to the user and what they want to see it along with freezing columns and creating favorites for way access.
  • It is so flexible with the system platforms that it can run on and so easy to customize since it supports so many databases.
  • It is intuitive and does not need to have a lot of training on how to use the software.
  • It's just a great ERP software and one of the better ones I've seen.
  • Oracle is FINALLY starting to listen to the users and SIGs and putting enhancements into the system which makes life easier for us business users.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The Configurable Network Language (CNC) is a proprietary protocol, and it can be difficult to source resources that understand this language well.
  • It has some inherent limitations with generating PDF or printable files. Most organizations use a third party platform like Creat!form or Bottomline to solve this.
  • No built in credit card processing solution, and no plug-and-play eCommerce or webstore capabilities available.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Oracle
great design and continuous improvements
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Oracle
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
Oracle
  • Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's advantage is significant cost savings and operational improvements when you run Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne in the Oracle Cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers the only no-compromise enterprise cloud platform for moving Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, its associated database systems, an ecosystem of apps to the cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's One-Click Provisioning tool allows you to deploy Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the Oracle Cloud in hours, not days while maintaining the integrity of existing customized apps.
Read full review
ScreenShots