Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Slack
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Slack is a group messaging or team collaboration app that aims to simplify communication for businesses. Features include open discussions, private groups, and direct messaging, as well as deep contextual search and message archiving, and file sharing. Slack integrates with a number of other tools, such as MailChimp, Dropbox, and Google Drive. Slack was acquired by Salesforce in December 2020.
The product is free to use, and also has paid plans with more features and greater controls.
The…
$0
per month per user
Pricing
Miro
Slack
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
per month per user
Free
$0
Pro
$7.25*
per month per user
Business+
$12.50*
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
Slack
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
*Per active user, per month, when paying once a year.
Pro is $8.75 USD per active user when paying month to month. Business+ is $15.00 USD per active user when paying month to month.
Figma and FigJam tend to be the choices for the designers I have worked with, but it can be a bit intimidating for those who are not technically literate. Slack's whiteboard feature hasn't really taken off with our team, and if we do use it, it is to quickly present something …
Mural and Miro seem extremely similar. I'm not as familiar with Mural but love all the tools in Miro for conducting actual sessions (timers, voting, etc.). FigJam is terrible - no comparison there.
Miro is first still in my mind. Miro in my opinion has the potential to become its own operating system where with the help of better integrations can hold everything you need to perform and operate during work and possibly outside work.
Jamboard felt very clunky compared to Miro. It was also very difficult to make your Jamboards look inviting. Conversely, Miro allows you to layer as much as you want/need. It allows you to easily create boards that work for the needs of your team - whether internal or …
Miro is more user friendly than Smartsheet, and provides for a much more free-hand use and variety of expressions than all of the above. When it comes to project management and calendar or process management, Miro is less functional and the only advantage is really that it is …
I have used Visio and Lucid in the past; they are not great. The biggest competitor, I think, is Excalidraw. It's free and works great for stuff other than the group collaboration piece. I think it might do that, too, but I don't pay for it. It beats Miro on quick and fast …
Miro One is a very user-friendly, easy-to-use, and cost-effective solution for any kind of business. The customer support is unmatched. It has the ability to improve team collaboration and communication in remote areas. It offers real-time updates and cross-functional …
About the same. Miro had more templates and more modern look. The design agency AJ&Smart moving to Miro in recent years was also a telling sign. I personally learned workshopping through them. If they moved from Mural, I determined it was for good reason and I could benefit also.
My team is able to collaborate and communicate in real-time thanks to Miro collaborative features. It helps give a bird eye view of our projects we're working on and this also allows our clients to easily understand what we're doing and put in their contribution as well. It has …
I prefer Miro over all, but then will use certain tools for specific use cases: Lucid - process work Menti - interactive polling and facilitated sessions UserVoice - crowdsourcing Trello - kanban boards (although Miro is pretty good with this too) Slido - live polling and …
Mural has integration problems and it also has some performance limitations on large whiteboards. While Miro integrates easily with third party apps and it’s performance is far better than Mural.
The amount of tools, the accessibility and the overall experience of Miro makes it a go-to compared to the others, especially given the ease of playing around all the different frames, images, etc.
I've tried Klaxoon once and I really didn't like my experience. As for Mural, I …
For our use cases, either Miro or Lucid would do the job. However, I find Miro easier to use: with Lucid you have to know some key combinations (e.g.: zooming in or out, dragging objects, or just scrolling your screen) ALso, in a bird's eye view, I found the objects in Miro to …
Overall, we found that Miro was easier to use and provided more proactive guidance and templates. Also, more people were familiar with the Miro brand and had used it in previous roles.
To be honest, I used a really short amount of time, and I didn't know Miro back then. When I started working in another company that is using Miro and has a license, I met with Miro. So, I don't have a lot to share about Whimsical. But I didn't think of using it after Miro.
Although Miro got quite a lot more expensive, it's the best white boarding tool out there. We had a trial where we tried to use Microsoft Teams whiteboards instead but quickly stopped due to the lack of functionalities and poor performance. Compared to other more advanced white …
There are several free sketching tools. In addition, iPads have freeflow which is available to everyone. Miro would definitely have lot more features than free tools but then cost-benefit analysis becomes justified only for users who use several features. For a once in a while …
The level of complexity for Power users is unparalleled in Asana. The only advantage Google Chat has is its linkage with Gmail, another indispensable tool. Google's meetings are better and connectivity-related issues are fewer. Microsoft Teams too is similar to Google Chat is …
I used to like Slack better than teams for a long time. Only after using Teams for few years and returning back to Slack on another organization, I can see the main differences and between them. None of them is perfect, MS Team is more deeply connected to your SP sites and in …
I think Slack is way better for chatting than Google, 100%! I think Team works great, but it might be tricky to use at its fullest capacity. Slack is more intuitive and easy to adapt to workflows. It's great that you can connect even with people outside your organization …