MS SharePoint / SQL vs. TimeXtender

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MS SharePoint / SQL
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.N/A
TimeXtender
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
TimeXtender was designed to be a holistic solution for data integration that empowers organizations to build data solutions 10x faster using metadata and low-code automation.
$1,600
per month
Pricing
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsOn-Demand pricing is pay as you go, month-to-month, with no commitment, at the "on-demand" price of $3.33/credit.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
8.9
55 Ratings
8% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports8.936 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.753 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.145 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.0
52 Ratings
10% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis8.942 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.552 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.030 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.750 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.1
56 Ratings
9% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Publish to Web8.852 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.048 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.845 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.740 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers10.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.2
34 Ratings
13% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.933 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization10.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics10.029 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.3
67 Ratings
8% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)10.059 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.062 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.566 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.053 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.2
57 Ratings
15% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access9.754 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application9.133 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.038 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
MS SharePoint / SQL
9.3
37 Ratings
16% above category average
TimeXtender
-
Ratings
REST API9.028 Ratings00 Ratings
Javascript API9.926 Ratings00 Ratings
iFrames9.027 Ratings00 Ratings
Java API9.025 Ratings00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)9.032 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)9.923 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 9.9 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(74 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MS SharePoint / SQLTimeXtender
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
A simple and important scenario well suited is that you can configure alerts to notify you when the production server fails. another best feature is the report server is the central component of reporting services. For me something less appropriate is that the admin must ensure optimal performance for farm operations, they recommend that you install SQL Server on a dedicated server that does not run other farm roles and does not host databases for other applications.
Read full review
TimeXtender
TimeXtender has worked really well with our customers who have different data sources using complex data types in large quantities requiring a DW-like solution that can consolidate all data sources at one-HUB. TimeXtender does this well, and provides automation capabilities, the ability to easily handle slowly changing dimensions, handing data lineage and data security very well. TimeXtender has the ability to be very customizable, allowing the HUB to grow as your business does. TimeXtender's customer support team is super helpful and will work with you throughout your implementation to make sure you reach success with the product. The ROI for timeXtender versus competing products (there aren't many that do what timeXtender does) shows the investment to be worthwhile for the majority of organizations in today's data-rich corporate world.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Flexible - able to make any changes we would like vs traditional service desk system.
  • ROI - We were already using SharePoint for internal intranet, so we are simply getting more use out of licensing we had already committed to.
  • Easy to use for end users.
Read full review
TimeXtender
  • It has the ability to create one dynamic 'DW' or source of truth, consolidating all data sources in one HUB.
  • Ease of use, with a great UI that is easy to learn and adapt to.
  • Ease/speed of complex implementation.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It is hard to setup and nightmare
  • It requires a of infrastructure, thus it could be costly because of requirement and licensing required for everything to run smoothly
  • If it is not setup and organized properly from the beginning it could be maintenance nightmare
  • It is hard to have "test" environment to do patches or similar
Read full review
TimeXtender
  • Product Marketing: As implementers and resellers of this technology, we loved it. But, convincing clients who had not previously heard of TX/Discovery Hub was more difficult than it could have been if the company had a larger marketing force behind it.
  • Relatively New to Market: it creates a learning curve for early implementers.
  • More information should be published on timeXtender's website about product lines, including testimonials.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
This was a long-term buy-in from a corporate perspective, to remain in the SharePoint space. Migration is certainly possible, which is good for planning and having options further out. At this point, the only planned migration is to eventually move the architecture up to SharePoint/SQL 2013. At that point, we will be able to leverage some greater efficiencies, some enhanced content design and management features, and some more current social features. It is well worth a full consideration in any shop looking at a new implementation of or migration to SharePoint (although you will probably be considering 2013 versions or beyond in those discussions), but the platform should be a strong competitor to any alternatives. Realizing the capability of a fully-branded and customized website was not part of the original choice for the architecture at Lincoln, but seeing it implemented and functioning now with this capacity far beyond original expectations has certainly cemented plans to continue using it.
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
SharePoint is very complex. This makes usability somewhat difficult from an IT perspective. An IT generalist will be able to pick it up and run with basic tasks. More customized functions would require significant specialized training and therefore limit what a standard user would be able to achieve. From an end user perspective, it's pretty straightforward to use.
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
It's been fantastic in terms of Premier Support so far. If there is an issue and if you report if the product has an issue, they will act upon it immediately. In some cases, if you design/develop something using the platform, Microsoft appreciates it and... publishes it on their public website. But you have to wait for some time if it is a non-Premier Support issue as you may experience delays.
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Not implemented in best practice way, there are many customizations
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
At the time of the two large projects, SharePoint was the enterprise solution so we were required to use that. We have since lobbied the enterprise teams to review and consider Atlassian Confluence and were successful. Confluence is cheaper than Sharepoint which is why we wanted to bring that in. The enterprise has now made Confluence an enterprise solution as an alternative to SharePoint. After using both I think SharePoint has many more add-ins than Confluence. It has much more customization ability than Confluence. SharePoint is not good for mobile readiness. Confluence is so there is a difference that might lead you to Confluence over SharePoint. I would also say that SharePoint is very document-centric and that Confluence has better KM than SharePoint does. even with the use of SQL Server. We were told that we could not use Google Drive even though it had features we liked.
Read full review
TimeXtender
For our clients, timeXtender was a much better solution. It offered a more cost-effective solution, easier integration, and better customer support for our complex client needs. The timeXtender team worked with us throughout the process to make sure we could create a success story that was repeatable for our clients, and they proved great partners.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • I've installed SharePoint in many different industries and each industry has seen greater collaboration among their teams both locally and nationally. The ability to collaborate more efficiently has reduced the need to have employees centrally located.
  • Companies which have used SharePoint in a end user training portal have had great ROI, since they can create the content once and share with all their users who subscribe to their training service. The web content management aspect of SharePoint is a very helpful feature.
Read full review
TimeXtender
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots