Microsoft SharePoint vs. Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SharePoint
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Skype for Business was an online messaging and conferencing tool, now superseded by Microsoft Teams.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Editions & Modules
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Considered Both Products
SharePoint
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
It replaced our fileservers. It also replaced our former intranet server. Having SharePoint online means always having the latest version, features, and technologies. Our team that manages it all has to be up-to-date on it, but they do, and so occasionally new features are …
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
  • Google Docs: Not enterprise ready, but great at multi user edits. Subsites and integration not native. Use of service accounts not a strong suit. Not audit friendly
  • Slack: Discontinued due to security features and lack of AD integration (At the time)
  • Confluence: Better at …
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
Similar to my ROI section, SharePoint combines what many individual platforms do. It’s much easier to have one system that is streamlined than uploading to multiple places and sites.
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
The institution tried a couple other solutions such as Alfresco, Box.com, and even Facebook for business. I believe only Alfresco was the closets to replicate most of the MS Sharepoint functionality. What it comes down to, is the requirements. For example, if you are looking …
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
It met the needs of the company and was easy to implement. Being part of the MS suite of offering pretty much made the decisions for us.
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
SharePoint meets or beats every competitor. We are also big Microsoft partners and have deep expertise with this platform. Our ability to manage and extend the platform combined with its industry leading specs and capabilities made it the natural choice for our organization.
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Hangouts have the worst user interface I've ever seen on a web application. Skype is a separate purchase, while Office 365 includes Skype as part of the subscription. When it comes to competing with Skype, Hangouts needs an overhaul of the UI. We've made the switch to Microsoft …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype still has its own place when it comes to the chatting apps competition. Its integration with Microsoft and other tools like Outlook makes it very intuitive and easy to use. I like the "show status" a lot too and it tells me whether a person is busy or available for …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
We are currently utilizing both Skype for Business as well as Microsoft Teams. This is because Teams will eventually be the replacement for Skype for Business. Both offer us similar functionality, but Teams has a much steeper "learning curve" since it has so much added …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
The internal chat and video calls are great. Jive doesn't have that. It requires a GoToMeeting subscription for video calling.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
N/A
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for Business has a simpler interface and is easy to understand.

Microsoft Teams is a software that has a more polluted interface, which if the user does not have experience with, they will need training to use it.
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Skype for business is just a professional tool compared to all competitors.
There are no things that will distract you from finishing your daily tasks unlikely from competitors which are trying to make mix of Fun and Business, but my personal opinion is that a Business tool …
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Previously with had Lynnc, which had issues in on line meetings ,and wasn't as rich in features, I think.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.6
192 Ratings
5% below category average
High quality audio00 Ratings8.0188 Ratings
High quality video00 Ratings7.7183 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements00 Ratings6.6180 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings8.0144 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.5
189 Ratings
7% above category average
Desktop sharing00 Ratings8.8189 Ratings
Whiteboards00 Ratings8.3119 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.8
186 Ratings
5% below category average
Calendar integration00 Ratings8.0172 Ratings
Meeting initiation00 Ratings8.1180 Ratings
Integrates with social media00 Ratings7.882 Ratings
Record meetings / events00 Ratings7.6141 Ratings
Slideshows00 Ratings7.7113 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.6
171 Ratings
3% above category average
Live chat00 Ratings9.2169 Ratings
Audience polling00 Ratings8.592 Ratings
Q&A00 Ratings8.192 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.1
154 Ratings
3% below category average
User authentication00 Ratings8.2140 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings7.9146 Ratings
Confidential attendee list00 Ratings8.1108 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Small Businesses
Concrete CMS
Concrete CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
ClickMeeting
ClickMeeting
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Google Meet
Google Meet
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(192 ratings)
8.6
(195 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(21 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(17 ratings)
9.0
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(11 ratings)
8.5
(40 ratings)
In-Person Training
4.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(4 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SharePointSkype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Very user friendly. If you're already using M365 products it offers great integration! If you're using Azure AD it offers SSO for IAM and integrates nicely with Azure AD Groups which can then be used for Access management. As our IT / Azure Administrator, I particularly like the "sharing link" options where you can send a link with an expiration date and not have to remember to remove the link / access after a project / business case scenario is over.
Read full review
Microsoft
Skype is useful for collaborations across distances, including work from home, as well as a more convenient way to communicate with a large group of people. Skype is also useful to communicate with specific parties quickly, rather than relying on cellular service in areas where not as available. Skype is less useful if the team does not use computers , tablets, smartphones, etc in daily workflow as it would rarely be used.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Making collaboration easier via a better connection between accounts. You can share anything from a file to events with just a couple of clicks.
  • All services are connected and switching between services is a breeze[.]
  • Solutions to the majority of everyday business problems.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Instant messaging to anyone who we know only by name/email. Even if they're offline, they get the message in missed convos and a notification automatically goes to them via Outlook mail. All conversations are saved and accessible via Outlook.
  • Video and voice calls are a norm in the WFH scenario, and an average employee has around 4-5 calls a day. Skype gives notifications for upcoming meetings, allows easy scheduling via outlook calendar, and its audio/video quality [is] reasonably good compared to the amount of data it consumes.
  • Status availabilities - in the WFH scenario, you could be off for lunch, out of office, busy, sharing screens - and might not want to be disturbed. Skype allows you to do that, and in case you're off, ensures that you know that you have missed messages.
  • Screen sharing - we have to share screens at least once or twice a day with a coworker when working on some issues/features, and Skype easily lets us do that. One of the best things about Skype is that the screen can be shared without being on a video/voice call - which is of immense advantage because oftentimes, you could prefer sharing the screen, while it [is] too noisy to talk.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • There are far too many good features to choose from, and advanced features are noticeably absent.
  • There is room for improvement in terms of integration with non-Microsoft products, as well as developer Story.
  • It is challenging to provide easier access via file explorer while also granting outside users and guests access.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Probably the biggest area is the video element as it has historically struggled in this area.
  • The need to be forced to federate with another organisation by providing yours and enabling the other organisation settings is a bit tedious but once done, allows for simple collaboration between third-parties.
  • Functionality wise, as it's an older product and being superseded by MS Teams, it feels as if it's run its course but was very good for what it does/did at the time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
Read full review
Microsoft
The software is simple to install and configure. It is rather simple to explain for correct use. It is possible to profile users for the different functions offered. It is integrated quite completely with Outlook and with Active Directory security. It performs all communication functions well with one or more interlocutors and the possibility of granting control of your computer is convenient.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
Read full review
Microsoft
Very easy to use. Even though Microsoft Teams has a lot of features and integrations, as a user I feel completely comfortable on finding what I need, getting information about the app extensions and using them. It's a very comprehensive tool, intuitive design and does not make me feel tired to be using it. I am glad with the current experience.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers
  • Quick turnaround time for issues
  • A range of support services
  • Access to a network of resources
  • Escalation of issues
  • Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement
The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.
Read full review
Microsoft
I have only had to reach out to the Support team at Skype for Business once with an issue, and I was pleasantly surprised and encouraged by the quickness and thoroughness of their response. The wait time was short and my question was dealt with politely and clearly, so I would say the support team has it together.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational
Read full review
Microsoft
Skpe for business is utilized company wide in regards to my company. Everyone not only uses it, but uses it often. It is an effective way of communicating. It also integrates very nicely with outlook and all conversation history is pushed to a folder within the outlook system. We also have it so that if someone misses a message, they are sent an email reminder saying that there is a message that went unread.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
Read full review
Microsoft
For the below reason I will always choose this app over its competitors: Better audio and video quality, Little to no disconnections or freezing when on a call/video conference Integrates well with mailbox/ calendar/ one drive, and SharePoint is easy to use
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Increased collaboration - MS Sharepoint has increased knowledge share and collaboration between departments. This saves time and energy because of its efficient and effective communication
  • Increased document security - MS Sharepoint has increased our document security so we're safer knowing that our documents are security and access controlled appropriately. We are less prone to get in trouble by our customers due to the security provided by MS Sharepoint
  • Negative Impact Compared to other software - Not sure if the MS Sharepoint's main functionalities could've been met with other tools we currently have
Read full review
Microsoft
  • We almost lost our biggest client because of the poor performance early on in our implementation...the online meetings were poor quality for audio and bandwidth refreshing
  • Many of the employees in our company disliked the quality so much, they started to sign up for free Cisco WebEx accounts to use instead
  • The majority of employees in our company lost trust in our CTO because of his decision to switch from Cisco WebEx to Skype for Business
Read full review
ScreenShots