Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SharePoint
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
Wrike
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$9.80
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft SharePointWrike
Editions & Modules
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$9.8
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SharePointWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SharePointWrike
Considered Both Products
SharePoint

No answer on this topic

Wrike
Chose Wrike
We moved from excel trackers and SharePoint Classic forms/lists to Wrike. We were never able to create a branching logic request form so it was long and cumbersome. We had to manually put together excel sheets from several sources to report out our work so leadership had little …
Chose Wrike
With MS-Project, only a select few people had licenses, and they distributed PDF copies that were immediately obsolete. We used SharePoint for a ticket system and it was adequate for those working in a silo, but we are working as part of a larger project, so being able to link …
Chose Wrike
Better in resourcing worse in scheduling, both better and worse in terms of use control it is easier to move tasks in Wrike but also easier to make mistakes, the snapshot function is a bigf benefit compared to others, lacks against deltek in reports for EV or actuals dd dd
Chose Wrike
Jira required too many third party integrations in order for us to be able to do what we can do with Wrike right out of the box! Wrike works seamlessly with the rest of the Microsoft suite we use, and the Teams integration keeps our team on task and our business partners …
Chose Wrike
I have noticed that Microsoft Teams requires searching and doesn't allow for quick referencing of data files. I am annoyed by the fact that I have to constantly scroll through prior messages or try to find a specific message. I also do not like the fact that if there was a …
Chose Wrike
Basecamp was one of the original Work Management platforms, but Wrike is absolutely light years ahead of Basecamp nowadays.
Chose Wrike
While Slack is mostly a chat tool, it also had use for organising teams working on specific jobs. Wrike works in the same way, while also being a secure place to store documents and complete workflows. The security and all-in-one nature of Wrike means it is doing the job of Slac…
Chose Wrike
Wrike blows Basecamp out of the water. It's very user-friendly and easy to find and manage your workload. It makes document management and the review process SO MUCH EASIER.
Chose Wrike
More functionalities and flexibility
Chose Wrike
Multi level tiers and subtask was virtually non-existent in ZenDesk, Their bulleting system was horrible and task just welded together in long paragraphs that went on forever. It was too confusing and the only way to keep track was to print and highlight different parts of task …
Chose Wrike
We looked at multiple produce, specifically Microsoft Project and Clarizen Go. Wrike had the customization we needed along with the support staff and training to implement the product. The user interface is great with many views available, including custom views. The built-in …
Chose Wrike
In my opinion Wrike is just as user friendly and has fantastic automations that work well for my company and team.
Chose Wrike
Wrike can be a simplified version of other options. Especially when you don’t need to manage the entire company from a program.
Chose Wrike
We chose Wrike after careful software selection with three other products. The goal is to identify and define a working standard for greater efficiency during the definition, planning, execution, monitoring, and finalization of products. Wrike proved to be the best and easiest …
Chose Wrike
I have used both Clarizen and Microsoft Project. I think that Wrike falls between these two platforms. Wrike is easily a better tool to use than MS Project, but I think it lacks some of the expanded capabilities that support PM work that Clarizen has--such as capacity planning, …
Chose Wrike
Wrike is more intuitive to use and has A LOT more functionality, such as collaboration and integration with other apps.
Chose Wrike
We were utilizing a SharePoint form and list to manage work previously to Wrike. SharePoint did not allow for creative proofing or collaboration. It really was nothing more than a glorified spreadsheet. Obviously, Wrike is much better for us.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft SharePointWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
679 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.6674 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.7564 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.8475 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings7.8588 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.7570 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.6672 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.7338 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.0298 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.2566 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.2516 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings7.6485 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.9302 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.7226 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
230 Ratings
5% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.1227 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.6130 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SharePointWrike
Small Businesses
Concrete CMS
Concrete CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SharePointWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(192 ratings)
8.4
(713 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(21 ratings)
8.3
(94 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(17 ratings)
8.4
(55 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(18 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(15 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(11 ratings)
9.0
(84 ratings)
In-Person Training
4.5
(1 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(1 ratings)
7.7
(11 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(4 ratings)
9.1
(31 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(10 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(6 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(11 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SharePointWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Very user friendly. If you're already using M365 products it offers great integration! If you're using Azure AD it offers SSO for IAM and integrates nicely with Azure AD Groups which can then be used for Access management. As our IT / Azure Administrator, I particularly like the "sharing link" options where you can send a link with an expiration date and not have to remember to remove the link / access after a project / business case scenario is over.
Read full review
Wrike
My organization used Google Sheets to work with subbies, but we've since switched to Wrike. It is user friendly, has formulas and customizable fields. Wrike has been a lifesaver because instead of sharing Google Sheets with external customers and typically they messing up - deleting formulas, users can simply fill out a request form without logging into Wrike . All details are displayed in a table view, making management much easier.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Making collaboration easier via a better connection between accounts. You can share anything from a file to events with just a couple of clicks.
  • All services are connected and switching between services is a breeze[.]
  • Solutions to the majority of everyday business problems.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has been consistent in emailing any updates or changes to each person involved in each task.
  • Wrike has a simple to navigate website, with quick access to each task.
  • Wrike keeps all data files located at the top of the task for quick reference, which makes it easier for each team member to find.
  • Wrike adds date tags as well as any edited or deleted notes where we are able to cross-reference any major changes that may have been made.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • There are far too many good features to choose from, and advanced features are noticeably absent.
  • There is room for improvement in terms of integration with non-Microsoft products, as well as developer Story.
  • It is challenging to provide easier access via file explorer while also granting outside users and guests access.
Read full review
Wrike
  • The email notifications that are automatically sent from Wrike when something is done are easy for users to miss or ignore.
  • Reporting can be limited. You have to create workarounds for collecting/storing the name of the person submitting the form in instances where they do not have their own Wrike license.
  • A more user-friendly interface, especially for those less familiar with project management software, would enhance overall accessibility.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike, overall, is pretty easy to setup and use. I still find challenges in changing milestone dates but our programs / date changes are different than industry standard so that is partly the issue. We love the Excel look along with the dashboards! There are also built in analytics that really assist in seeing where the projects are!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers
  • Quick turnaround time for issues
  • A range of support services
  • Access to a network of resources
  • Escalation of issues
  • Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement
The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.
Read full review
Wrike
Support is very quickly and they want to solve problems actively. When I need additional info I can use community forum, when I've an issue I can use support form to get help. The support is of excellent quality from the first level, to grow when you talk to the engineers it becomes even more important
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
Read full review
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
Read full review
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational
Read full review
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
Read full review
Wrike
I have not used other products except Microsoft Teams channels with file sharing and standard sharing from Adobe, text and email messaging, and Zoom/gotomeeting sharing. This is the first product that I have used that had the functionality and platform where the sharing is simplistic. It is better than standard sharing through email or other simple forms because everything stays together.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Wrike
not sure
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Increased collaboration - MS Sharepoint has increased knowledge share and collaboration between departments. This saves time and energy because of its efficient and effective communication
  • Increased document security - MS Sharepoint has increased our document security so we're safer knowing that our documents are security and access controlled appropriately. We are less prone to get in trouble by our customers due to the security provided by MS Sharepoint
  • Negative Impact Compared to other software - Not sure if the MS Sharepoint's main functionalities could've been met with other tools we currently have
Read full review
Wrike
  • Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
  • Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of Wrike TemplatesScreenshot of Team WorkloadScreenshot of Wrike ReportsScreenshot of Wrike apps & integrationsScreenshot of Wrike Gantt Chart