Microsoft SharePoint vs. XWiki Collaboration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SharePoint
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
XWiki Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
XWiki Collaboration Suite (XCS) is a software solution that is built on top of the XWiki Enterprise Open Source project. According to the vendor, XCS tackles 2 main use cases: Information & Knowledge Management Collaborative Work It is available on premise or as SaaS and is packaged with XWiki SAS services. These services include: support, a yearly upgrade, initial setup and configuration.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Editions & Modules
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$4 seat
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Considered Both Products
SharePoint
Chose Microsoft SharePoint
MS SharePoint is light years ahead of Wiki in terms of functionality and collaboration. Wiki is outdated and does not have advanced features. The site also is just slower and does not have a sharp look like MS SharePoint does. I also know that it is easier to build out and get …
XWiki Collaboration Suite
Chose XWiki Collaboration Suite
XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:

  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Microsoft SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Notifications00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft SharePoint
-
Ratings
XWiki Collaboration Suite
7.8
1 Ratings
4% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Small Businesses
Concrete CMS
Concrete CMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Workvivo
Workvivo
Score 9.3 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Workvivo
Workvivo
Score 9.3 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(192 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.8
(21 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(17 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(11 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
4.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft SharePointXWiki Collaboration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Very user friendly. If you're already using M365 products it offers great integration! If you're using Azure AD it offers SSO for IAM and integrates nicely with Azure AD Groups which can then be used for Access management. As our IT / Azure Administrator, I particularly like the "sharing link" options where you can send a link with an expiration date and not have to remember to remove the link / access after a project / business case scenario is over.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Making collaboration easier via a better connection between accounts. You can share anything from a file to events with just a couple of clicks.
  • All services are connected and switching between services is a breeze[.]
  • Solutions to the majority of everyday business problems.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • There are far too many good features to choose from, and advanced features are noticeably absent.
  • There is room for improvement in terms of integration with non-Microsoft products, as well as developer Story.
  • It is challenging to provide easier access via file explorer while also granting outside users and guests access.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers
  • Quick turnaround time for issues
  • A range of support services
  • Access to a network of resources
  • Escalation of issues
  • Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement
The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Microsoft
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational
Read full review
XWiki SAS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
Read full review
XWiki SAS
XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
  • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Increased collaboration - MS Sharepoint has increased knowledge share and collaboration between departments. This saves time and energy because of its efficient and effective communication
  • Increased document security - MS Sharepoint has increased our document security so we're safer knowing that our documents are security and access controlled appropriately. We are less prone to get in trouble by our customers due to the security provided by MS Sharepoint
  • Negative Impact Compared to other software - Not sure if the MS Sharepoint's main functionalities could've been met with other tools we currently have
Read full review
XWiki SAS
  • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots

XWiki Collaboration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of XCS HomepageScreenshot of XCS AdminScreenshot of XCS for CollaborationScreenshot of XCS TourScreenshot of User Profile