6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
151 Ratings
6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
151 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.7 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Netsparker

Netsparker is very thorough but can take a very long time to scan a web application. It can also take a long time to learn and configure. Its thoroughness is a very good part of the product but if the application does [not] need this thoroughness it is probably a waste of time to run Netsparker on the website.
Glenn Jones | TrustRadius Reviewer

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

As stated, we do a LOT of API testing, the SwaggerHub import makes it easy to add APIs. This is very well-suited, as well as easy management of the steps/cases/suites inside of ReadyAPI. The one thing I do wish ReadyAPI was better suited for is changes to data, we have a lot of test cases in ReadyAPI and if we make a change to how the backend data is structured, one-by-one adjustments need to be made to the steps. Less appropriate, UI testing.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Netsparker

  • NetSparker has excellent customer service. When our team had to learn to use it for the first time, we had to communicate directly with NetSparker consultants.
  • NetSparker is very user-friendly. It's UI is organized and keeps all the different scans we have set-up in a very clean visual.
  • Netsparker has a selection of workflows and integration tools that make it useful for keeping all of my teammates on the same page.
Jatel Desai | TrustRadius Reviewer

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

  • Different Load testing techniques with variable loads and settings allowing to load test your service in different ways
  • Assertions are much easier to use by inspecting responses, especially xpath assertions
  • Exporting test scripts and linking them on jenkins
  • Modern and user friendly GUI compared to free version
  • Running test scripts in parallel
Ahmed Amer | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Netsparker

  • Netsparker Cloud is expensive and restricts the number of website URLs that you are allowed to scan. This restricts us from scanning all of the websites that we create and only allows us to scan a small subset of number of the website we produce.
  • Netsparker is difficult to configure and I often need to open a ticket with support to figure out how to use the product. I have been vulnerability testing websites for over 10 years and I still don't think I really know how to use Netsparker.
  • Netsparker can take a very long time to complete a scan due to the number of items it can scan for. Be certain to reduce the technologies that your scan will be looking at. Also, expect a large website to possibly take over two days to complete. Not something you really want to have happen on a developer checking on some source code.
Glenn Jones | TrustRadius Reviewer

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

  • Sometimes Ready API Test performs poorly or freezes when REST response contains a lot of data
  • Performance Tests documentation could be updated to describe different assertion points with examples of usage.
  • Ability to disable certain test steps only in the Performance Tests section, while leaving them on for Functional Tests could be added.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Likelihood to Renew

Netsparker

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 7.5
Based on 18 answers
The only reason this isn't a '10' is because of the cost. This product is definitely meant for organizations who are serious about making sure they invest in the full ecosystem of API design, development, maintenance. But there is a significant cost associated with this investment. and because of this cost (and the non-tangible output for executives), it is a difficult line-item to justify in this post-pandemic environment.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

Netsparker

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 10.0
Based on 4 answers
SOAP UI was mainly developed to test SOA-based application which is majorly SOAP-based web services, SOAP UI works well with SOAP services which are XML-based and when you work with SOAP UI for some time you will understand that it is meant to test SOAP services predominantly.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Reliability and Availability

Netsparker

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 9.0
Based on 2 answers
Soap UI has managed to continuously build on it's solid foundation and keep improving by each release. It is by far the most dependable and accurate testing tool out there of its kind. Available via connecting to VM's created as SoapUI test machines give access to it anytime, anywhere practically.
Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

Performance

Netsparker

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 8.0
Based on 2 answers
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing.
Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Netsparker

Netsparker 10.0
Based on 2 answers
NetSparker support is amazing. When first introducing this software to the team, there was a lot of communication going on between Netsparker consultants and our team. They have answered our questions very efficiently and have had consultants come to our department for training. They are open to suggestions for improvements and enhancements as well.
Jatel Desai | TrustRadius Reviewer

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 8.1
Based on 12 answers
To be honest, we didnt had much issues with the support, as there is already plenty of online communities available for help. But if ever there were some minor issues with the membership or the certificates, the tech support was always quick and efficient enough to resolve the issue ASAP
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Implementation Rating

Netsparker

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 7.0
Based on 3 answers
no very easy but lacks documentation
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Netsparker

I currently use OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite Professional and Veracode Dynamic Scan. ZAP is very easy to use and the web developers use it regularly. Burp Suite is very customizable as is Netsparker but usually take much less time to scan a website. Both of these tools are programmable and allow me to add special items to a scan when I need it. They are also much better documented. Veracode also has a static code analysis tool that we use much more often then the dynamic analysis tool but we do use both parts of Veracode.
Glenn Jones | TrustRadius Reviewer

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI provides intuitive GUI capabilities compared to their own open source product. When compared to Postman, ReadyAPI also supports SOAP based services, which is a saver especially when integrating with legacy or other third party systems.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Scalability

Netsparker

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro) 7.0
Based on 1 answer
It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very
good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. However, I have read that added monitoring tools have been added, which if so the 7 could possibly go to a 8 or 9.
Christopher Saleh | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Netsparker

  • NetSparker has saved the team a lot of time since the scans quicker than our older software.
  • NetSparker has been costing the company a lot compared to previous security software.
  • Netsparker has helped improved our overall business objectives by finding an efficient and collaborative way to run scans on our systems.
Jatel Desai | TrustRadius Reviewer

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

  • We were able to achieve our needs in API test automation with the tool
  • In terms ROI, I would say that we have gotten what is basically needed
  • Though the initial setup was tough, after that we were able to continue it with user friendly UI and reporting.
  • Overall, it had [a] neutral impact in terms [of] ROI.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

Pricing Details

Netsparker

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV Pro)

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

Add comparison