NetWitness Network vs. Tempered Airwall

It is perfectly suited for large organizations aiming for providing web security to the customers or also if they are interested to setup their own security perations center . It is one of the leading security tools in the market and offers comprehensive capability in dealing with web attacks

Incentivized

It's very well suited for geographically dispersed organizations, where deploying and managing remote firewalls and other network security functions aren't practical. Once deployed, and the deployment isn't difficult after planning and understanding the data flows of the IoT devices, the system is easily managed and flexible. You're able to allow front line operations people to add devices into a role without sacrificing the integrity of the security model.

Incentivized

• Full packet capture allows look back on security events
• Packet reconstruction is essential to make sense of packets captured
• Threat analysis of captured packets provide additional indicators of compromise

Incentivized

• Low capital and support cost structures.
• Ease of deployment.
• Ability to work over the existing network.

Incentivized

• The meta part to form the dashboards were a bit complicated
• The user interface could be made more understandable

Incentivized

• Integration with third-party security controls.
• Automating the on-boarding of devices.
• Reporting needs to be more detailed.

Incentivized

It's pretty darned good for a new company. We had to hash through a couple of instances that no one had ever run into, but once we got to the right person on the engineering team, they were able to work through the solution pretty quickly. The nice thing is, unlike Cisco, once you fix something, you don't find three new things that have to be changed.

Incentivized

It was more advanced and comprehensive . The personalized dashboards and view was the major likeable difference . The correlation could help us analyze better and was more effective , the drill down features gives more information at one go

Incentivized

The cost and complexity vs. ISE is as different as Uber and Lift are from trying to take a taxi in Duluth, Minnesota. The complexity of Cisco's IoT security is a joke. It was going to take us over a year just to deploy all the Cisco equipment, and that was if we could have gotten it all working together. We got the entire project deployed in just under 3 months, and that includes working out all the bugs and logistics. Honestly, I don't think all the Cisco parts would have ever been running like Cisco promised it would. It's just way too complicated.

Incentivized

• The tool is great and an important part of my tool box
• The level of administration needed is a little too high
• Support relationships have to be customer led and prompted

Incentivized

• Capital cost to deploy was 1/4 the cost of doing Cisco.
• People and time frame to do the entire deployment was 1/12th the time/people to complete the installation.
• On-going management is being done without adding staff.

Incentivized