HP BTODiscontinued vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HP BTODiscontinued
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
HP BTO (formerly OpenView) was a system and network monitoring tool from Hewlett-Packard, and is now End of Life (EOL).N/A
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Network Node Manager i is a network management platform acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, and now supported by OpenText.N/A
Pricing
HP BTODiscontinuedOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HP BTODiscontinuedOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HP BTODiscontinuedOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
HP BTODiscontinuedOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Small Businesses
Atera
Atera
Score 8.9 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.1 out of 10
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HP BTODiscontinuedOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
HP BTODiscontinuedOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
HP Openview really helped us when we migrated our old SAP Data from IBM Platform to OpenText.
Read full review
OpenText
[Micro Focus Network Node Manager i (formerly HP Network Node Manager)] is like you implement it, setup monitoring and alerting and forget it forever until any major activity is there and that is possible because of the product's stability. Another reason for product stability is less features as compared to other vendor tools and its own inbuilt database.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • SAP Batch Job monitoring.
  • File Systems
  • Database Montioring
Read full review
OpenText
  • Network Fault and Performance Monitoring
  • Fault Tolerant
  • Distributed Architecture
  • Stability in operations
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Monitoring interface should be more user friendly.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Flow monitoring.
  • QoS.
Read full review
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Support is long and arduous and often are unable to help resolve the issue. We often have to do escalations or duty manager to get things moved. Even with a technical account manager, we do not see much improvement from a support point of view. This is an area where Micro Focus has a lot of improvement to do.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
User friendly, easy to access and more detailed info during the monitoring.
Read full review
OpenText
Even though there are many products in the market such as from Solarwinds, CA Spectrum (no DX Spectrum), PRTG that offers similar or even with more flexibility the fault and performance monitoring still Micro Focus is a very nice tool when it comes to Scalability and Stability with all necessary monitoring coverage. There is no external database required and hence less issues with integration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Biggest support in maintaining 10,000 Linux servers.
Read full review
OpenText
  • HP NNM is very good at producing root cause analysis. MTTR is reduced with NNM.
Read full review
ScreenShots