<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
67 Ratings
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
67 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Application Performance Management

    7.6

    CoScale (discontinued)

    76%

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    CoScale (discontinued) ranks higher in 12/12 features

    Application monitoring

    9.1
    91%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Database monitoring

    8.2
    82%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Threshold alerts

    7.3
    73%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Predictive capabilities

    5.5
    55%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Application performance management console

    9.1
    91%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Collaboration tools

    7.3
    73%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications

    8.2
    82%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Application dependency mapping and thresholding

    7.3
    73%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Virtualization monitoring

    9.1
    91%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Server availability and performance monitoring

    6.4
    64%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting

    7.3
    73%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    IT Asset Discovery

    6.4
    64%
    1 Rating
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • CoScale (discontinued) is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.2

    CoScale (discontinued)

    82%
    1 Rating
    8.0

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    80%
    20 Ratings

    Usability

    CoScale (discontinued)

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.3

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    73%
    1 Rating

    Support Rating

    7.3

    CoScale (discontinued)

    73%
    2 Ratings

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    CoScale (discontinued)

    CoScale is designed specifically to monitor container and microservices environments managed by Kubernetes ecosystem.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is well suited for any complicated environment where you have apps and servers across multiple clouds and platforms and products. If you have a data centre where all your apps and servers are in one single network, you could probably get away with older solutions. But for any modern, complex, hybrid-cloud microservices environment, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is a must-have.
    David Williams | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pros

    CoScale (discontinued)

    • Visualizes Kubernetes web performance in context.
    • Automatically creates a number of default, but very informative dashboards.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    • SignalFX handles historical metric aggregation exceptionally well, providing a multifaceted approach to event detection based on anomalies.
    • SignalFX's cost is incredibly flexible with their pricing model of DPM (data-point per minute) vs the traditional "per host" model that most monitoring SaaS use.
    • SignalFX support is responsive and knowledgeable, very eager to help solve your immediate problems.
    • SignalFX integrations is vast and constantly growing, making adoption easy even when multiple different open-source technologies are used in your stack.
    DJ Enriquez | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Cons

    CoScale (discontinued)

    • It is missing a summary view of resource consumption by all instances of a given service.
    • Takes an old school approach to save dashboard changes with a button.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    • Better integration with our clients (native mobile clients SDKs will be great).
    • A way to easily tag filters and move them across metrics/formula.
    • Alert system to easy false [alarm] and hard to configure.
    • Be able to have group more dimensions (and have more values on each).
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Pricing Details

    CoScale (discontinued)

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    General

    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    $15 per month

    Usability

    CoScale (discontinued)

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring 7.3
    Based on 1 answer
    I find that learning the interface can take some time. We need a better show-and-tell on how the Teams pages, Dashboard Groups, Dashboards and charts delay.Advance SignalFlow is sometimes hard to build. Some better samples of advanced SignalFlow would be helpful. For example, Splunk SPL has a vast resource of examples.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Support Rating

    CoScale (discontinued)

    CoScale (discontinued) 7.3
    Based on 2 answers
    We have been working with CoScale for quite some time now, and we have not encountered too many problems really. The majority of minor issues we ran into were quickly solved by reaching out to technical community forums. When it comes to the remaining ones, we were able to solve those efficiently with assistance from the supporting team of technical experts.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    CoScale (discontinued)

    CoScale was developed as a next-generation monitoring and alerting system for Kubernetes container orchestration engine, and it largely delivers what was promised by leveraging direct integration into the orchestration engine itself. Compared to other vendors, CoScale's in-container monitoring allows even to monitor the services running within the containers, which makes a huge difference for us.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    They’re not for the same purpose but we’re using NewRelic and Honeycomb for monitoring purposes. NewRelic is used for HTTP client monitoring for system related throughput, error, database and external client monitoring. Honeycomb is used to monitor actual HTTP request/response values. Splunk [Infrastructure Monitoring] is used for real-time application related throughout and error monitoring.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Return on Investment

    CoScale (discontinued)

    • Information provided by CoScale accelerates problem solving for us.
    • Significantly lowers the time to identify any issues with our container environment.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

    • It has improved the Service Level Agreement.
    • The response time to resolve the issue has been decreased exponentially.
    • There is a new resolution category now i.e. zero call resolution which is a result of the AI-driven feature that helps resolve things before they really occur.
    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

    Screenshots

    Add comparison