Nintex Promapp® vs SAP BPM

• Promapp provides a clear understanding of end-to-end processes for business users to ensure buy-in and ongoing maintenance.
• Promapp allows users and SMEs to identify improvements and opportunities for automation to ensure that business operations can run as efficiently as possible.
• Nintex Workflows allow for automated back-end review processes to be undertaken with limited overhead of users needing to track where things are at at any given time.

Read full review

• Virtual paper trail. Iterations of process and current documentation are all stored as "artifacts", leaving a great trail.
• Configuration of users. BPM somewhat magically determines which users will be impacted and automates rules.
• A pro (that is also a con) is the design interface. If you know what you are doing, it is incredibly powerful and malleable.

Read full review

• Perhaps starting price can be lowered with lesser processes.
• Available for on-premise options for some clients (though pricing can still be subscription model).
• Perhaps this is something that we are not aware but can the printing of the process be configurable for white labeling?

Read full review

• Live readings would be nice.
• Easier to maneuver
• Work with all systems with the press of one keystroke

Read full review

• Promapp is a core component of our business management system and has been used extensively in our ERP evaluation and implementation project
• The Risk Management features allowed integration with the process management activities and removed the need to acquire a separate risk management tool.
• The tool is well accepted in the organisation and is the goto reference point for business processes.

Read full review

• Helped us harness integrated benefit from having SAP ERP/CRM by leveraging NetWeaver to define business processes/rules and monitor exceptions
• Did not have any negative experience except for the fact that at times when multiple rules run, it can be somewhat slow

Read full review