Norton

Norton

72 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Norton	Score 8.1 out of 10	N/A	The Norton products, including Norton 360, Norton Antivirus, and Norton Security, are consumer antivirus and privacy protection products, and are now a product line of NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) after the enterprise security division of Symantec was acquired and is now part of Broadcom.	N/A

Pricing

Norton

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Norton
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Norton
Considered Both Products	Norton Verified User Professional Chose Norton Updates are better in Norton. Support is always greater with Norton. The interfaces are totally different and it is so easy to use Norton. Th cost of renewal is also better in Norton compared to McAfee Data Center Security Suite. Helpful? Mohammed Badr web developer & admin projects Chose Norton I actually have been victimized avast at no cost and it slowed down my entire laptop and it hangs every time I scan the system for threats. This frustration created Pine Tree State to switch to Norton. Incentivized Helpful? John Danniel Coding Traineeship Chose Norton I have found Norton doesn’t slow down a computer as Avast antivirus has done. Avast is also not so much pocket-friendly as compared to the Norton, which is available at a very reasonable price which is highly affordable for me. The basic reason to Choose Norton on any other … Helpful? SERGIO CHAVES Commercial & Marketing Manager Chose Norton It is the most recommended antivirus because it is the most virus detected and eliminated with a very reliable heuristic, great protection guaranteed, great spindle facility, real-time protection against viruses, eliminates everything easily, is easy to install and easy to … Helpful? Jackie Bassett NEJM Insights Council Chose Norton Using a hosted model, we know we are always getting the best core cybersecurity, but for the endpoints, we don't need something as complex as FireEye, and we wanted more than Lookout was able to provide. Lookout was terrific, and it came already installed with many of our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Norton We liked the pricing of Norton better. Also, it was more reliable in finding suspicious attachments and phishing emails than Avast was. Lastly, it ran better on our machines. The feedback we got from our pilot testing batch was very positive and that is what made us take the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Norton I prefer Norton but I dont think there is a huge difference in quality between the two. Kaspersky has some extra features that are nice (but not must haves) and the price difference is negligible. Incentivized Helpful? dhruv gupta Sales Executive Chose Norton Norton is better in terms of features especially identity safe and non-intrusiveness and is very economical (10 user licenses). Incentivized Helpful? Sasha Luse Eco Advisor Chose Norton This is our first system Incentivized Helpful? Rebecca Neilson CEO Chose Norton Have tried McAffe and others in the past. None are as secure and Norton! Incentivized Helpful? Susan Knolla Director - Talent Management Chose Norton If Norton offers an enterprise system I think it would be excellent. McAfee is slow to update and doesn't provide as much flexibility as Norton. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Norton User-friendly interface (it's not just AV and users who were interacting with the product), performance, resource usage (most of the computers were not very fresh and that factor was very critical), efficiency, it shouldn't be just sitting on a PC - it should protect it, what … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Norton Our go to product is Webroot. Unlike Norton Internet Security it is built for MSP's that need multi-tenancy options. Webroot also does not need to be installed on a server (like NIS) and it uses much fewer resources on the endpoints. Norton is licensed annually, Webroot is … Helpful? Bruce Emmerling Digital Media Specialist Chose Norton Other security products have their own strengths and weaknesses but Norton Internet Security does very well in terms of performance and working with Android OS devices. While past versions were known to be performance hogs, today's incarnation of the security program is well … Incentivized Helpful? Marc Uydess Technical Security Analyst Chose Norton Norton 360 has a better detection rate as well as remediation rate than the others I have used. It also does not affect the computer resources if configured properly. It provides an all in one solution that is easy to configure for the novice user and provides easy to review … Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Easy to use Pro Password manager Pro Frequent updates
Top Cons	Minus Customer service Minus Step by step Minus Lot of ram

Best Alternatives
	Norton
Small Businesses	SentinelOne Singularity Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	SentinelOne Singularity Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	SentinelOne Singularity Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Norton
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (16 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (4 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	9.0 (2 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.5 (2 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Norton
Likelihood to Recommend	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) For a stand-alone business this should do the trick, but if using across multiple clients (multi-tenancy not an option). Default settings within the program will cause performance issues if not tweaked, meaning someone with networking experience may be necessary. Not ideal for MSP's unless they only have a few clients, as the manageability must be done within "the walls" of each company. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) Norton works quite quickly and is efficient enough to detect threats It is very easy and simple to install and is without any complications and irrelevant inquiries. Norton is available at a very reasonable price in the market and is not heavy on pocket. John Danniel Coding Traineeship Read full review
Cons	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) Cost could be an issue. They could perform a free trial at the beginning for people to check. It would be good if you can do an online free check of your computer. While the updates are good sometimes your computer is attacked by a virus they did not expect. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) I did renew it before because support is great and cost is great. I believe that Norton has a very long experience in what they do and they are doing a great job with all the updates they provide and the work they are doing. Moreover Norton is going in the right direction for sure. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) Well organised interface. Incentivized dhruv gupta Sales Executive Read full review
Support Rating	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) Security software with very good features that works in the background. Price suitable for companies of any size and easy to install and use. Incentivized Amberly Crain Project Manager Read full review
Implementation Rating	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) Would like a manual or online version that is simple to understand and explains in detail what choices we have and why to make these choices. Incentivized Rebecca Neilson CEO Read full review
Alternatives Considered	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) User-friendly interface (it's not just AV and users who were interacting with the product), performance, resource usage (most of the computers were not very fresh and that factor was very critical), efficiency, it shouldn't be just sitting on a PC - it should protect it, what was perfectly done with that product. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec) Poor performance against Spyware and other threats despite claiming to act against them (recognizes very few and eliminates less) It is limited to viruses. Regular blocking of incoming scripts (in front of other antivirus) Little or almost no compatibility with the Windows XP Firewall, but they are involved. SERGIO CHAVES Commercial & Marketing Manager Read full review
ScreenShots